MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2912460931 · doi:10.5287/ora-b7axkrdnj

The role of hypoxia-induced RRM2B in DNA replication

2016· dissertation· en· W2912460931 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Iosifina P. Foskolou

Bibliographic record

VenueOxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) · 2016
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMitochondrial Function and Pathology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBC Cancer AgencyMedical Research CouncilEuropean CommissionUniversity of OxfordKing's College LondonCancer Research UK
KeywordsReplication (statistics)DNA replicationCell biologyHypoxia (environmental)DNAChemistryBiologyGeneticsVirology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Regions of low oxygen (hypoxia) occur in most solid tumours and correlate with poor patient prognosis due to their resistance to chemo- and radiotherapy and to their increased metastatic potential. Severe levels of hypoxia induce DNA replication stress characterised by an increased number of stalled replication forks and significantly reduced replication rates, which occurs in the absence of DNA damage. Ribonucleotide Reductase (RNR) is the only enzyme capable of de novo synthesis of dNTPs – the building blocks of DNA synthesis and repair. However, oxygen is essential for mammalian RNRs (RRM1/RRM2 and RRM1/RRM2B), leading us to question the source of dNTPs in hypoxia. Here we show that the RRM2B subunit of RNR is significantly induced in response to hypoxia in a universal manner. Interestingly, the hypoxic induction of RRM2B occurs both at transcriptional and translational levels and likely through two distinct mechanisms, one of which is p53-dependent. Most importantly, we demonstrate that RRM1/RRM2B enzyme is capable of retaining activity in hypoxia and therefore is favoured over RRM1/RRM2 in order to preserve on-going replication. We found two distinct mechanisms by which RRM2B maintains hypoxic activity and we identified specific RRM2B-residues (Y164 and K37/K151) responsible for this function. The importance of RRM2B in the response to tumour hypoxia is further illustrated by increased expression in the hypoxic regions of glioblastoma biopsies, roles in tumour growth and radioresistance, as well as prevention of DNA damage and apoptosis. In this study we present multi-disciplinary evidence, demonstrating the molecular rationale for the ability of RRM1/RRM2B to function in hypoxia. We propose that RRM2B has been evolutionary conserved so as to act as the hypoxic specific RNR subunit in order to be able to react promptly when this physiologically relevant stress occurs. Our data provide new insight into RNR biology, highlighting RRM2B as an important, hypoxic-specific, anti-cancer therapeutic target.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)Same topicMitochondrial Function and PathologyFrench-language works237,207