Reciprocal relations between dietary restraint and negative affect in adolescents receiving treatment for anorexia nervosa.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent research has identified the important but overlooked role of negative affect in the maintenance of dietary restriction. However, understanding how fluctuations in negative affect relate to symptoms of anorexia nervosa (AN) during treatment is limited. In a longitudinal study, the reciprocal associations between higher and lower order dimensions of negative affect and dietary restraint were examined in adolescents undergoing treatment for AN. The sample consisted of 107 adolescents (Mage = 15.5, SD = 1.5 years) who underwent family-based treatment over the course of 6 months. Self-report data assessing negative affect and dietary restraint were collected at baseline, 6 times throughout treatment, and again at the end of treatment. Findings from lagged hierarchical linear models revealed reciprocal associations between higher order negative affect and dietary restraint but unidirectional associations among some dimensions of lower order affect. Specifically, dietary restraint predicted increased guilt and hostility, whereas fear predicted increased dietary restraint. These findings highlight the importance of examining the distinct dimensions of negative emotion and the temporal role of fear in precipitating dietary restraint, and guilt and hostility in proceeding dietary restraint. Collectively, these findings emphasize the functional nature of different emotions in the process of AN remission and provide preliminary evidence of affective mechanisms related to change in symptomatology during treatment for adolescent AN. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".