P621 Real-world effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab and anti-TNF in biologic-naive Crohn’s disease patients: results from the EVOLVE study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This multi-country, retrospective chart review study assessed the effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab (VDZ) compared with anti-tumour necrosis factors (anti-TNF) agents in a real-world cohort of biologic (bio)-naïve Crohn’s disease (CD) patients. Bio-naïve CD patients (≥18 years old) treated with VDZ or anti-TNF (May 2014 to March 2018), were included from sites in Canada, Greece and the USA. Data were collected from treatment (Tx) initiation to earliest of death, chart abstraction date or 6 months post-Tx discontinuation. Using the Kaplan–Meier method, cumulative rates of clinical response, remission, mucosal healing, dose escalation and Tx persistence were estimated over 24 months (mo). Incidence rates (per 100 person-years [PYs]) of CD exacerbations, CD-related surgeries (bowel resection, strictureplasty, colectomy), serious adverse events (SAEs) and serious infections (SIs) were assessed. A Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for baseline confounders (age, sex, albumin, C-reactive protein, disease location and duration, CD-related hospitalisations in (prior 12 mo), and disease severity) was used to compare Tx cohorts; adjusted hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals are reported. Overall, 419 CD patients (VDZ: 177; anti-TNF: 242) [adalimumab: 125, infliximab: 111, infliximab-dyyb: 3, certolizumab pegol: (3) from 37 sites were included (median [min–max] follow-up [mo]: VDZ, 15.3 (5.0–45.9); anti-TNF, 18.1 [6.0–49.8]). Baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. Table 1. Baseline characteristics of real-world biologic-naive Crohn’s disease patients treated with vedolizumab and anti-TNF agents. At 24 months, cumulative rates of clinical response, clinical remission, mucosal healing and dose escalation were similar in both Tx cohorts (Table 2). Tx persistence rates were significantly (p < 0.05) greater at 12 months (86% vs. 76%) for VDZ vs. anti-TNF patients, respectively, but did not differ at 18 (79% vs. 71%) and 24 months (71% vs. 71%). Although observed incidence rates (per 100 PYs) of CD exacerbations (17.2 vs. 25.9; p = 0.09), CD-related surgery (1.7 vs. 6.2; p = 0.079), SAEs (6.4 vs. 11.7; p = 0.16) and SIs (1.6 vs. 3.6; p = 0.13) were lower in VDZ vs. anti-TNF patients, respectively, these differences did not reach statistical significance. Adjusted HR for outcomes are shown in Table 2. Table 2. Clinical effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab and anti-TNF agents in real-world biologic-naïve Crohn’s disease patients Clinical and endoscopic outcomes in this real-world cohort suggest that VDZ and anti-TNF in CD are equally effective in a first-line biologic setting over 24 months.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".