MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2912516009 · doi:10.5430/jha.v8n1p65

The ‘SAFE’ initiative – An innovative approach to safer patient care in a tertiary hospital setting

2019· article· en· W2912516009 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Deepan Krishnasivam, Lesley Bennett, Katherine Birkett, Tim Bowles

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hospital Administration · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPatient Safety and Medication Errors
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSAFERAccountabilityPatient safetyMedical emergencyEmergency medicineRapid response teamHealth care

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Out of hours inpatient care within Australia, defined as the hours outside of 0800 to 1600 hours Monday to Friday, is traditionally provided by on-call medical teams, working in silos, supported by onsite junior medical staff. This model can be associated with poor communication both between and within teams, lack of accountability, failure of escalation, and a reactive model of care. International literature reveals that the outcomes of patients admitted to hospital out of hours are poorer, resulting in a discrepancy in mortality between in and out of hours admissions.Methods: We aimed to reduce the discrepancy in mortality between in and out of hours admissions, as well as reducing overall inpatient mortality. Using a resilience engineering approach, we introduced a novel model of out of hours care - the ‘Safety After Hours for Everyone’ (SAFE) Team. This incorporated a departmental model, with clear and robust internal leadership, external accountability, and formal processes for identification, review and follow up of at risk patients, as well as protocolised escalation processes.Results: The introduction of the SAFE model has been associated with a continuous reduction in the overall Hospital Standardised Mortality Ratio (HSMR) from 0.71 to 0.54 (periods January to March 2015 vs January to March 2018. In addition, the SAFE model has been associated with a reduction in out of hours mortality (defined as admissions from 1600 to 0800) from 0.98 to 0.38 (periods January to March 2015 vs January to March 2018). This has been accompanied by a qualitative improvement in the quality of care delivered out of hours, and improved satisfaction with working conditions and training delivered out of hours. Due to a drastic reduction in unplanned Resident Medical Officer (RMO) overtime associated with the introduction of the model, implementation was near cost neutral.Conclusion: The introduction of the SAFE model has been associated with improved hospital outcomes, in conjunction with improved medical and nursing staff experiences, at a low marginal cost. This model has scope to be applied to similar tertiary level hospitals, or modified to fit within most hospital structures. A key component to the success of this model’s innovation, is acknowledgement of the importance of after hours care provision to patients, highlighted by the formation of a department of after hours medicine as part of the SAFE model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.136
Threshold uncertainty score0.446

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Hospital AdministrationSame topicPatient Safety and Medication ErrorsFrench-language works237,207