MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2912518253 · doi:10.1002/msc.1385

Factors associated with physical activity engagement among adults with rheumatoid arthritis: A cross‐sectional study

2019· article· en· W2912518253 on OpenAlex
Xiang Li Tan, Gemma Pugh, Frances Humby, Dylan Morrissey

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMusculoskeletal Care · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCenters for Disease Control and PreventionRosetrees TrustNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilArthritis Society
KeywordsMedicineInterquartile rangeRheumatoid arthritisInternal medicineCross-sectional studyPhysical therapyPopulationDiseasePhysical activityMetabolic equivalentDemographyGerontologyEnvironmental healthPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Objectives Physical activity (PA) has a number of benefits for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. However, these patients are more physically inactive than the general population. The primary aim of this study was to investigate factors associated with PA engagement among RA patients. The secondary aim was to identify their preference for PA support. Methods There were 96 participants, 76 of whom were female, with a mean age of 56.9 years (range = 34–72 years) and a median RA disease duration of 5 years (interquartile range = 2–12). All patients completed questionnaires assessing demographic status, health status (including cardiovascular disease [CVD] risk and RA disease profile), PA levels and preferences, alongside the perceived benefits of—and barriers to—PA. Hierarchical regressions were carried out to assess the relationship between reported PA levels and both engagement determinants and disease features. Results Forty‐five per cent ( n = 44) had low levels (<600 metabolic equivalent‐min/week) of PA. Low level of PA was significantly associated with: CVD risk profile (η p 2 = 0.118, p < 0.002); functional disability (η p 2 = 0.206, p < 0.032); pain (η p 2 = 0.154, p < 0.028); general personal (η p 2 = 0.190, p < 0.001) and arthritis‐specific personal (η p 2 = 0.170, p < 0.001) barriers to PA; age (η p 2 = 0.076, p < 0.026); and sedentary behaviour (η p 2 = 0.275, p < 0.001). Participants displayed a preference for unsupervised ( n = 37, 38.5%), low‐intensity ( n = 45, 46.9%), indoor home ( n = 50, 52.1%) exercises, with no preferences for the diversity of the exercise prescribed ( n = 39, 40.6%) or for who provided the exercise counselling ( n = 34, 35.4%). Conclusions These results suggest that CVD profile, disability, pain, and general and arthritis‐specific personal barriers are associated with PA levels among RA patients. Intervention development should address these factors to facilitate an increase in PA uptake.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it