Biopolítica e repressão feminina: configurações da reprodução humana no romance distópico "O conto da Aia" de Margareth Atwood
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The universe articulated by the Canadian writer offers a 21st century metaphor, from a society that strictly follows biblical precepts under an authoritarian state regime. In this regime, fertile women have their rights suppressed, to exercise a single function: to be AIAS, serving men, gestating healthy children. In a time of scarce birth, they are responsible for the continuity of the species. This article focuses on the intervention, authoritarian and calculative management of human life through biopolitics, allowing attacks against human rights on the sign of the preservation of life, public interest and the common good. In this sense, the work has as its relevance the contestation of the historically imputed role to the woman, linked to an age-old responsibility for human reproduction, which subjects her to limiting conventions directly linked to her sexuality. Thus, the aim of the work, from the dystopian novel is to bring reflections based on the concept of biopolitics under the eye of Michael Foucault. It also intends to bring to light considerations about the intervening role of the State and of the Law, with respect to human reproduction, to the detriment of respect for the identity and self-determination of the feminine gender, under a theoretical-qualitative methodological approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".