Las series web como cartografías de la sexualidad: la representación de la interacción lésbica en la ciudad global en Féminin/Féminin y The Foxy Five
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En el contexto del aumento de la visibilidad de personajes no heterosexuales en la cinematografía y en las series de televisión, como también de la cada vez más abundante literatura académica acerca del género y la sexualidad en la geografía, este artículo pretende examinar la serie para Internet como un formato de rápido crecimiento que desempeña un papel esencial en la representación y creación de espacios lésbicos. Con este propósito, analizaremos dos producciones - Féminin/Féminin (CHLOÉ ROBICHAUD, 2014) y The Foxy Five (JABU NADIA NEWMAN, 2016) – que se enfocan en la interacción entre personajes femeninos no heterosexuales en Montréal y Cape Town. Dichas series ofrecen una perspectiva compleja sobre las maneras en las que las mujeres lesbianas, bisexuales y trans (de diferentes grupos raciales) experimentan, cuestionan e intentan subvertir las geografías de poder.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.016 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.039 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".