MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W291271320

Manifold Borders and Encounters: Canada and Montreal in Mavis Gallant's 'Linnet Muir'

2012· article· en· W291271320 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Isabella Martini

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Communication Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTravel Writing and Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeaning (existential)NothingNarrativeInterpretation (philosophy)HistorySociologyGenealogyLiteratureLinguisticsArtEpistemologyPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

my own train crossed the border to Canada I expected to sense at once an air of calm and grit and dedication, but the only changes were from prosperous to shabby, from painted to unpainted, from smiling to dour. I was entering a poorer and a curiously empty country, where the faces of people gave nothing away.M. Gallant, Home Truths, Toronto, Macmillan of Canada, 1981, p. 222.As Linnet Muir crosses the US border and enters Canada in the opening short story of the eponymous sequence by the Anglocanadian writer Mavis Gallant, the image described is far from the idea of contemporary Canadian reality, multifaceted, multicultural, modern, technological. the summer of 1941, the border between US and Canada divided not only different economies, but also social convention, attitudes - even towards war - and cultural activities. Place as Ashcroft, Griffiths e Tiffin [1] recall, is a complex interaction of language, history and environment, and it is marked by a sense of displacement. Particularly in Gallant's stories, space and places, selected and filtered by narrator's or characters' perception, contribute to shape a complex and thorough system of meaning, where its decoding is essential for text interpretation. Besides, Gallant's is a narrative of exile(s): places, spaces of exile and their relation with characters are decisive in their being exiles. Furthermore, a simultaneous superimposition of a double past vision of Montreal reveals itself to be the strategy of search and recomposition of Linnet's father figure. Places in this 'return sequence' map the past of Linnet and the fully aware growth of her new identity as a woman, a journalist and as a writer.As Brian McHaIe suggests in one of his seminal studies, «different dominants emerge depending upon which questions we ask of the text and the position from which we interrogate it» [2]. Therefore, the six stories of 'Linnet Muir' were examined in order to make a topological dominant explicit. As a more accurate topographical grid surfaced, it was evident that places - i.e., their features and functions - directed the textual interpretation, as they provide anwers to the queries pertaining both their ontologie and their epistemological dimensions.«How did my father die?»: that is the starting query of the investigation which is the reason for Linnet to come back to Montreal, together with the desire to sever all connections with her mother. She needed the city and its public and private places to recall her memories and to seek those who witnessed the events that led to the disintegration of her family. However, the different accounts that she obtained from her father's acquantainces and from her partial and sketchy memories led her to a version of her past which is neither definite nor truthful, already at the end of In Youth Is Pleasure. Her inquiry then shifted from an openly epistemological level to an ontologie one, because her core queries became: «Who was my father? Who am I? relation to which worlds can I define myself as an individual?»As it was impossible for Linnet to elicit irrefutable answers from people, she shifted her search towards the places connected to her memories of her father. Her queries then changed: «Where was (and is) my father?», «Where was (and am) I?», «In relation to my worlds (past and present), how can I define myself as an individual?». A dialectic is established between the places of her childhood and the same places that she found when she returned to Montreal. Indeed, places supplied her with the only empirical data from which to start her search again.Linnet's investigations display a crossing of manifold borders. They proceed from a time contemporary to the narrating voice, where an older Linnet, presumably speaking in the Seventies, questions two other different time levels, both of them past, confronting each other on the same ground, i.e. Montreal. To the topologically overlapping childhood and young years of Linnet correspond two images of Montreal used by the narrator to recreate the complexity of her past and her identity. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.153
Threshold uncertainty score0.982

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0750.026
Scholarly communication0.0140.005
Open science0.0040.011
Research integrity0.0050.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Communication ResearchSame topicTravel Writing and LiteratureFrench-language works237,207