MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2912787310 · doi:10.1161/str.50.suppl_1.wmp47

Abstract WMP47: Traditional Doppler Measures Do Not predict Cognition in a Cohort With Advanced Atherosclerosis

2019· article· en· W2912787310 on OpenAlexaffabout
Carol Mitchell, Stephanie M. Wilbrand, Thomas D. Cook, Nirvedh H. Meshram, Catherine N. Steffel, Rebecca Nye, Tomy Varghese, Bruce P. Hermann, Robert J. Dempsey

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Canadian institutionsDempsey (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyTranscranial DopplerInternal medicineMiddle cerebral arteryCarotid endarterectomyInternal carotid arteryCognitionEffects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performanceMontreal Cognitive AssessmentStenosisVerbal memoryIschemiaPsychiatryDementiaDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Traditional Doppler measures have been used to predict cognitive performance in patients with carotid atherosclerosis. Novel measures, such as carotid strain indices (CSI) have shown associations with cognitive performance. We hypothesized that lower mean middle cerebral artery (MCA) velocities, higher bulb-internal carotid artery (ICA) velocities, MCA pulsatility index (PI) and CSI would be associated with poorer cognitive performance in individuals with advanced atherosclerosis. Methods: Neurocognitive testing, carotid ultrasound, transcranial Doppler and CSI were performed on 40 subjects scheduled for carotid endarterectomy. Kendall tau correlations were used to examine relationships between cognitive tests and the maximum peak systolic velocity (PSV) (from bulb, proximal, mid or distal ICA), mean MCA velocity and PI (on surgical side) and CSI (maximum axial, lateral and shear strain indices used to characterize plaque deformations with arterial pulsation). Cognitive measures included age adjusted indices of verbal fluency, verbal and visual learning/memory, psychomotor speed, auditory attention/working memory, visuoconstruction, and mental flexibility. Results: Participants were median age 71.0 (IQR 9.75) years, 26 male (65%) and 14 female (35%). Median stenosis was 70.00 (IQR 10.00) percent. Traditional Doppler parameters, PSV, mean MCA velocity and MCA PI did not predict cognitive performance (p values all >0.05). Maximum strain values were significantly associated with cognitive performance (p<0.05). Table . Conclusions: Traditional velocity measurements of maximum bulb-ICA PSV, mean MCA velocity and PI were not associated with cognitive performance in patients with advanced atherosclerotic disease, however maximum strain indices were associated with cognitive performance. Findings suggest that cognition may be associated with unstable plaque (plaques at greater risk for rupture) rather than blood flow.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases→French-language works237,207→