MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2912899081 · doi:10.2136/vzj2018.08.0152

Quantifying Nitrate Leaching under Commercial Red Raspberry Using Passive Capillary Wick Samplers

2019· article· en· W2912899081 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Shawn E. Loo, Bernie J. Zebarth, M. Cathryn Ryan, T. Forge, Edwin E. Cey

Bibliographic record

VenueVadose Zone Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaCanadian Water Network
KeywordsLeaching (pedology)Environmental scienceFertilizerAgronomyHydrology (agriculture)Soil waterSoil scienceGeologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Core Ideas NO 3 leaching was quantified by passive capillary wick samplers over 2 yr. NO 3 leaching was three times greater in Year 1 than Year 2 (240 vs. 80 kg N ha −1 ). Increased Year 1 NO 3 leaching reflected field renovation prior to monitoring period. There was strong seasonality in NO 3 leaching from the field. Despite fertilizer banding in rows, 60% of NO 3 leached from alleys between rows. Groundwater NO 3 –N contamination in the Abbotsford‐Sumas Aquifer in British Columbia, Canada, has been attributed primarily to NO 3 –N leaching from red raspberry ( Rubus idaeus L.); however, direct estimates of NO 3 –N leaching are lacking. This study quantified the magnitude and timing of NO 3 –N leaching under a commercial red raspberry field over 30 mo (October 2010–March 2013) using passive capillary wick samplers installed below the root zone at three row locations (irrigated row, nonirrigated row, and alley) after the critical period of field renovation and replanting. Substantial NO 3 –N leaching (240 kg N ha −1 ) during the first year of monitoring was attributed to the effects of field renovation (including autumn chopping and incorporation of raspberry canes and soil fumigation and spring poultry broiler manure application) in the year prior to the initiation of monitoring. Lower NO 3 –N leaching (80 kg N ha −1 ) occurred in the second year of monitoring under typical mineral fertilizer management practices. Strong seasonality of NO 3 –N leaching was observed in both years, with ∼48% in autumn, 34% in spring and summer, and 17% in winter. Approximately 60% of the NO 3 –N leaching was attributed to the alleys between raspberry rows, which did not receive mineral fertilizer or irrigation. The high proportion of leaching during spring and summer and from the alleys suggests that growing‐season irrigation practices and alley vegetation management, respectively, would be good targets for the development of improved practices. The samplers were effective in quantifying the magnitude and timing of NO 3 –N leaching from a commercial agricultural field and informing the development of improved practices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.818

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVadose Zone JournalSame topicSoil and Water Nutrient DynamicsFrench-language works237,207