Портретна галерея освітніх і наукових діячів в часописі «Нові дні»(Portrait Gallery of Academic and Scholarly Activists in Periodical New Days)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
У тезах представлено дослідження одного із діаспорних періодичних видань. У центрі увазі – відомий канадський часопис «Нові дні» – універсальний ілюстрований щомісячник, що виходить у Торонто з 1950 р. Серед величезної кількості опублікованих на його сторінках матеріалів чимало статей присвячено низці освітніх та наукових діячів, що внесли вагомий вклад до розвитку української культури як на батьківщині, так і за океаном. Розглянуто значення цих статей як важливого джерела до вивчення історії закордонного українства, їх роль у збереженні пам’яті про видатних діячів та підтримці національної самоідентифікації в середовищі українських громад Канади, США. (The article deals with the research devoted to one of the diaspora’s periodicals. The researcher’s attention is focused on the Canadian periodical New Days that is an illustrated monthly edition which has been published in Toronto since 1950. Among the enormous number of materials published on the pages of the periodical there are many articles on the activity of educational and scholarly figures who made a significant contribution into the development of the Ukraine culture both in Ukraine and abroad. This research considers New Days’ articles as an important source to study the history of the Ukrainians abroad. The author analyses the rrole of the periodical in preserving the memory of outstanding activists and in supporting national self-identification process inside the Ukrainian communities of Canada and the USA.)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".