MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2912942321 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjy222.647

P523 Endoscopic balloon dilatation is safe and has a high success rate in patients with stricturing Crohn’s disease

2019· article· en· W2912942321 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Eunsun Lim, M. Thai, Peter Hendy, Mahmoud Alchlaihawi, Rupert W. Leong, Susan J. Connor, Watson Ng, Bonita Gu, Daniel R. van Langenberg, Lena Thin, Julien D. Schulberg, Michael A. Kamm, Richard Gilmore, Kirstin M. Taylor, Olivia Sallis, Jane M. Andrews, Charlotte Daker, Murray L. Barclay, Gabrielle Wark, Simon Ghaly, Matt Begun, Krupa Krishnaprasad, Jakob Begun

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBalloon dilationAnastomosisCrohn's diseaseBalloon dilatationStenosisBalloonSurgeryRetrospective cohort studyMedical recordEndoscopyCrohn diseaseInternal medicineGastroenterologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stricturing Crohn’s disease (CD) is associated with significant morbidity and high rates of surgery with anastomotic strictures commonly occurring after surgery. Endoscopic balloon dilatation (EBD) may avoid or delay operative management of strictures. A retrospective audit of CD patients undergoing EBD was conducted at 11 hospitals across Australia and New Zealand. Local, prospectively maintained patient databases and procedure records were used to identify cases from June 1999 to October 2018. A stricture was defined as a narrow segment of intestine unable to be traversed with a colonoscope. Stricture length (long ≥4 cm, short <4 cm), location (ileal, ileocolonic, colonic, anorectal) and type (anastomotic vs. de novo) were collected from endoscopy reports. Dates of surgeries and follow-up were obtained from medical records. Technical success was defined as the ability to traverse the stricture following dilatation. Baseline smoking status, Montreal phenotype and medications for CD were also documented. A total of 236 patients with stricturing CD were identified (120 male, median age 48 [IQR: 10], 29% ileal, 12% colonic, 59% ileocolonic). A total of 620 dilatation procedures (303 for anastomotic strictures, 312 for de novo strictures, 5 unknown) were performed (median 2 per patient) with 428 (69%) on short strictures, 109 (18%) on long strictures, and 83 (13%) of unknown length. Balloon dilation diameter was 8 mm–20 mm (median 15 mm). Technical success was achieved in 433 (84%) of dilatations, and was significantly higher for short vs. long strictures (93% vs. 66%, p < 0.001). Technical success was lower in ileal strictures (72%) than colonic or ileocolonic strictures (89% and 85%, respectively, p = 0.002). End-to-end anastomosis had a numerically higher success rate (85% vs. 75%, p = 0.19). During the median follow-up time from first EBD to last review or surgery (50 months, [IQR: 30]), 55 patients (23%) required surgery for stricturing CD post-dilatation. The median time to surgery following the last dilatation was 8 months (range 0–90 months). Complications of EBD included 3 cases of perforation and two cases of aspiration. There was no major bleeding or procedure-related mortality identified. In one of the largest analyses of EBD for CD strictures, EBD is found to be a safe procedure with a high technical success rate overall. The highest success was observed in strictures less than 4 cm in length and non-ileal in location. EBD may be an effective strategy for avoiding surgery in stricturing Crohn’s disease and post-operative anastomotic strictures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and ColitisSame topicGastrointestinal disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207