MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2912980532 · doi:10.1109/lcn.2018.8638236

Intelligent Caching in Dense Small-Cell Networks with Limited External Resources

2018· article· en· W2912980532 on OpenAlexaff
Bingshan Hu, Maryam Tanha, Dawood Sajjadi, Jianping Pan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCaching and Content Delivery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCacheSmall cellBackhaul (telecommunications)Computer networkFalse sharingWireless networkWirelessDistributed computingThe InternetEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionCache algorithmsCellular networkCPU cacheBase stationWorld Wide WebOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A promising solution to alleviate the mobile traffic burden on the Internet is to cache the most popular content at the heterogeneous wireless network edge. However, due to the vast content stored at the remote server, and to cache effectively, it concerns the file popularity profile that may not be known by the network operators in advance. Therefore, online learning techniques are used to tackle the challenges brought by the unknown knowledge. We present an effective and efficient algorithm based on the stochastic combinatorial multi-armed bandits with locked-up slots to address the content caching problem. Our work particularly addresses the scenario where dense small cells with diverse user populations are deployed. Additionally, this network is only given limited external resources such as computational resource to learn the caching policies and wireless backhaul resource to refresh the caches. Our algorithm learns the caching policies online which is to decide which files to be cached sequentially. Despite sharing the limited external resources, the proposed algorithm guarantees the performance of each small cell to approach the optimum. Experiments are conducted to cross-validate the theorem presented in this work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.871
Threshold uncertainty score0.398

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCaching and Content DeliveryFrench-language works237,207