Child and youth participation in sexual health-related discussions, decisions, and actions in Njombe, Tanzania: A focused ethnography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sexual health is a signficant dimension of health among children and youth in Tanzania. Local discourses highlight concerns regarding HIV/AIDS and sexual violence. The aim of this study was to examine the experiences and participation of children and youth in sexual health-related discussions, decisions, and actions in Njombe; a Tanzanian rural community. A focused ethnography, with a participatory approach, was conducted over a 3.5 month period, using participant observation, group interviews, and analysis of key texts, as well as key informant advisors. Twenty-eight participants, 8-16 years of age, were recruited from a community Youth Peer Health Educator program and an HIV youth group. Four principal themes were identified: (a) knowledge and understanding of sexual health, (b) children/youth value sexual health education and discussion, (c) supports and barriers for participation in sexual health education, and (d) children/youth value participation in their own care and promotion of their health. Results demonstrated that these children/youth have the capacities, interests, and values to actively participate in matters affecting their health and sexual health. Specific barriers and supports to sexual health education were identified. The study demonstrated how young people's agency is socially mediated and can persist even when confronting significant barriers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".