STUDY ON THE MOVE TO <i>MAIKO</i>, PRODUCTION OF THE BRICK, THE COMPANY BADGE AND RELATIONS THE HUNTER & CO. OF THE <i>KANSAI-RENGA-KAISYA</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article reconsidered the Maiko bricks that J. Condor made to "AN ARCHITECT'S NOTES ON THE GREAT EARTHQUAKE OF OCTOBER, 1891." after the field investigation of the disaster area of the Nobi earthquake, and the Kansai Bricklay Co., which made the bricks. The following points became clarified. Initially, Kansai-renga-seisakuzyo was founded in 1886 at Ozone of Osaka by Simeirou, and Wada Hanbee participated in the capital in October 1887. The reason why the Kasai-renga-seisakuzyo moved to Maiko of Hyogo at early time was that Wada thought about the move of the factory. According to the document, the foundation of the Kansai-Renga-Kaisya was in January 1888, the company's authorization was June 16, 1888, but the completion of the factory was at the end of January 1889. According to the newspaper report, the company started manufacturing bricks in February 1889, the company produced 30,000 bricks every day. I thought that the company invited the engineer from British as for the Maiko brick having been slightly large with the front article, however, the reason was that the company manufactured the Maiko bricks with brick making machines imported from the UK via the Hunter & Co.. In addition, the Hunter & Co. participated in the management of the company. The company exported more than half of the bricks to Canada as the ballast of foreign ship. The Maiko bricks were rather large size, I thought in the previous manuscript because the company invited British engineers. However, the reason was that the company imported brick making instruments from the UK through the Hunter & Co. produced bricks. The company's mark of Kansai-Renga-Kabusikigaisya decides to combine three rectangles into a triangle by the company's advertisement. This stamp can also be confirmed on the brick used at the former the Hunter's mansion. And the Hunter & Co. was a stockholder of Kansai-Renga-Kabusikigaisya.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".