MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2913068901 · doi:10.4095/313584

Hydrogeology of the deep flow system within Quaternary sediments, south-central Ontario

2019· report· en· W2913068901 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Richard E. Gerber

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydrogeologyQuaternaryGeologyGeochemistryGeomorphologyHydrology (agriculture)Geotechnical engineeringPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aquifers utilized for private and municipal water supply within south-central Ontario occur within Early to Middle Wisconsinan sediments, specifically the Thorncliffe and Scarborough Formations. These formations, including the Sunnybrook Drift, are often and herein referred to as Lower sediments. These deep sediments are replenished by vertical groundwater flow through overlying aquitards including the Newmarket Till and/or silt-clay rhythmites of the late Thorncliffe Formation. Also, channelization episodes characterized by fining-upward sequences have locally breached the Newmarket Till sediment. Recent work, including detailed geologic and hydrogeologic analysis of cored sediment locations, and isotopic analysis of porewater and groundwater, has led to a refinement of the conceptual hydrogeological model of the Lower sediment package. Based on high-quality seismic, geologic and hydrogeologic data, a revised conceptual model of the 'Yonge Street Aquifer' (YSA) has been postulated. The YSA in the Greater Toronto Area has been utilized since the mid-1900s. The current municipal water supply system consists of nine wellfields installed between 1957 and 1991. Data reveal two generations of roughly north-south channels: older pre-Newmarket Till channels within Lower sediments (termed Thorncliffe channel) and younger post-Newmarket Till ORM-related channels (termed ORM channel) that incise both Newmarket Till and Lower sediments. The YSA is interpreted to occur within a Thorncliffe channel, with possible vertical connection to younger ORM channels and lateral connection to inter-channel Lower sediments. These channel deposits consist of fining upward transitions from coarse gravel, to sand, to rhythmically bedded silt and clay interpreted to be deposited within a channel-esker-subaqueous fan complex. The Thorncliffe Formation contains a wide range of facies assemblages characterized by contrasting permeabilities. The deposits with highest permeability occur within up to 80 m thick gravel and sand sequences at the base of the Thorncliffe channel. The response of piezometric levels to hydraulic stress confirms longitudinal connection along the channel with muted lateral hydraulic response in sediments outside channels. The YSA is considered a semiconfined (leaky) strip aquifer with observed transmissivities between 1000 to 4500 m2/d, in contrast to regional aquifer transmissivities that are generally less than 500 m2/d. Thorncliffe channels are interpreted to be up to 20 km long and approximately 2 km wide. This presentation discusses the development and current state of the hydrogeological conceptual model related to Lower sediments within the study area, and how it can assist in future endeavours. It is anticipated that this refined conceptual model can inform groundwater exploration and development for aquifers to be utilized for water supply or geothermal energy. Also discussed will be efforts to disseminate hydrogeologic knowledge in a format useful to public works, planning and scientific practitioners (e.g. 'groundwater problem area' mapping). A key process in the evolution of the conceptual model is that it is continuously subject to refinement as new data and information becomes available.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.125

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological formations and processes→French-language works237,207→