MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2913128669

OPTIMAX 2018 - a focus on education in radiology

2019· book· en· W2913128669 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Annemieke van der Heij-Meijer, C. Buissink, Peter C. Hogg

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Salford eBooks · 2019
Typebook
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiology practices and education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSession (web analytics)Medical educationMedicineRadiologyMedical physicsLibrary scienceComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This year, OPTIMAX was warmly welcomed by University College Dublin. For the sixth time students and teachers from Europe, South Africa, South America and Canada have come together enthusiastically to do research in the Radiography domain. As in previous years, there were several research groups consisting of PhD-, MSc- and BSc students and tutors from the OPTIMAX partner Universities or on invitation by partner Universities. OPTIMAX 2018 was partly funded by the partner Universities and partly by the participants. This year, five research projects were performed with a focus on education on dose- and image quality optimization. The research projects were: CT Simulation as an Active learning tool Redesigning a Radiography Practical Active Learning Space Does Radiographer Training Across Europe Alter Image Viewing Patterns and Decisions? An Investigation into the Use of Lead Shielding Protection in Abdominal Radiography Inter-user Variability in DXA Scanning and Analysis The summer school was concluded with a poster session and a conference, where the research teams presented their results. All five abstracts were submitted to the European congress of Radiology (ECR) and, when accepted, will be presented by the students as posters, or oral presentations. This book comprises of two sections, the first section contains several chapters about new educational applications for Radiology Education. The second section contains the research papers of the five research projects. Steering committee OPTIMAX 2018 Hogg P, School of Health Sciences, University of Salford, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom Buissink C, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Groningen, The Netherlands Aandahl I, Department of Life Sciences and Health, Oslomet, Oslo, Norway Jorge J, Haute Ecole de Sante Vaud – Filie TRM, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland O’Conner M, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.238
Threshold uncertainty score0.732

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Salford eBooksSame topicRadiology practices and educationFrench-language works237,207