Spectral Response of Water Under Different Concentrations of Suspended Sediment: Measurement and Simplified Modeling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Understanding the spectral behaviour of water is of the greatest importance to the quality management of water resources. Continuous monitoring by remote sensing is therefore essential for administrators seeking the efficient management of its many uses. The aim of this research was to characterise the spectral response of water submitted to different concentrations of sediments of varying textural properties, organic matter and salts, and to identify the implications of these characteristics using simplified modelling. The experiment was conducted at the Radiometry Laboratory of the Department of Agricultural Engineering of the Federal University of Ceará, Brazil. The soils used in the research came from two areas of irrigated agriculture in Ceará, one in Morada Nova and the other in Pentecoste. Both soils were classified as Fluvic Neosols; the first saline and the second saline-sodic, and presented significant differences in granulometric composition and organic matter content. From the results, it can be concluded that: (i) sediments added at different concentrations cause an increase and deformation of the reflectance curves, and that maximum spectral partitioning occurs at two reflectance peaks; (ii) derivative analysis favours the identification of wavelengths that best differentiate sediment concentration, allowing more-efficient modelling of the process; (iii) the characteristics of texture, organic matter and salt content have little effect on estimating suspended-sediment concentration in the water, making multiple linear regression modelling a viable option for this purpose.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".