Dilated Saliency U-Net for White Matter Hyperintensities Segmentation using Irregularity Age Map
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT White matter hyperintensities(WMH) appear as regions of abnormally high signal intensity on T2-weighted magnetic resonance image(MRI) sequences. In particular, WMH have been noteworthy in age-related neuroscience for being a crucial biomarker for Alzheimer’ s disease and brain aging processes. However, the automatic WMH segmentation is challenging because of the variable intensity range, size and shape. U-Net tackled this problem through the dense prediction and showed competitive performances on not only WMH segmentation/detection but also on varied image segmentation tasks, but it still accompanies a high complexity of the network architecture. In this study, we propose to use Saliency U-Net architecture and irregularity age map(IAM) to decrease the U-Net complexity without a performance loss. We trained Saliency U-Net using both T2-FLAIR MRI sequence and IAM. Since IAM guides where irregularities, in which WMH is possibly included, exist on the MRI slice, Saliency U-Net performs better than the original U-Net trained only using T2-FLAIR. The better performance was achieved with fewer parameters and shorter training time. Moreover, the application of dilated convolution enhanced Saliency U-Net to recognise the shape of large WMH more accurately by learning multi-context on MRI slices. This network named Dilated Saliency U-Net improved Dice coefficient score to 0.5588 which is the best score among our experimental models, and recorded a relatively good sensitivity of 0.4747 with the shortest train time and the least number of parameters. In conclusion, based on the experimental results, incorporating IAM through Dilated Saliency U-Net resulted an appropriate approach for WMH segmentation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".