Atitudes morais de atletas juvenis no esporte de competição: um estudo com praticantes do Futebol de Campo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Moral attitudes of youth athletes in competition sport: an exploratory-descriptive study with practitioners of footballMorality, according to the Theory of Moral Judgment (TJM) represents the behavior and the ways in which moral attitudes can determine social behavior. According to this theory, the "Gamesmanship” “Cheating” and “Commitment” are the attitudinal dimensions that evidence conflict in behaviors face to moral dilemmas. This research aims to explore and describe the average ratios obtained from the evaluation of four dimensions of attitudes: Commitment, Convention, Cheating and Gamensmanship. For this purpose, a sample of 46 youth athletes of football, male and aged 13-16 years answered the Attitudes Inventory for Moral Decision Making in Youth Sports (IATDMEJ-23). It was found that the dimensions "Gamesmanship” “Cheating” and “Commitment” (statistically indissolubles) are the dimensions that appear in first, followed by the dimension Convention in second. New studies are suggested in other sports controlling different variables.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".