Docteurs, guérisseurs et fossoyeurs : La médecine à Québec du XVIIe au XIXe siècle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le temps d'une promenade, plongez dans l'univers des guerisseurs d'autrefois, des Hospitalieres aux medecins, en passant par les sages-femmes et les chirurgiens. Revivez les grands maux qui ont afflige Quebec a une epoque ou la profanation des sepultures servait l'avancement de la medecine! Decouvrez les remedes concoctes par les apothicaires et reperez les cabinets des hommes de science, les hopitaux et les hospices. Mais mefiez-vous des charlatans qui se disputent le privilege de guerir votre corps et votre âme? Facile d'utilisation et abondamment illustre, ce guide donne au lecteur des indications precises sur le parcours a suivre. Celui-ci peut s'effectuer d'un seul coup (environ 90 a 120 minutes, incluant marche et lecture) ou par sections, selon l'agenda du visiteur! Les Services historiques Six-Associes se consacrent depuis 2000 a la communication historique: www.sixassocies.com Bases a Quebec, Les Services historiques Six-Associes se consacrent a la communication historique sous toutes ses formes et misent sur la recherche pour rendre le passe accessible et vivant. Les Services historiques Six-Associes se demarquent par leur polyvalence en offrant egalement des animations et conferences sur mesure et des services professionnels de recherche et redaction en histoire et patrimoine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.041 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".