Application of extended quadrature method of moments for simulation of bubbly flow and mass transfer in gas‐liquid stirred tanks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the present paper, two gas‐liquid stirred tanks, one agitated by a radial impeller and another by an axial impeller, are modelled using the open‐source computational fluid dynamic (CFD) package OpenFOAM (open source field operation and manipulation). The combined effect of the bubble break‐up and coalescence in the tank is considered by a population balance model (PBM) called extended quadrature method of moments (EQMOM). The three‐dimensional simulation is made using a multiple reference frame (MRF), a well‐established method for the modelling of mixers. Dispersed gas and bubble dynamics in the turbulent flow are modelled using the Eulerian‐Eulerian approach (E‐E) with mixture k‐epsilon turbulent model and the modified Tomiyama drag coefficient for the momentum exchange. The model is developed to predict the spatial distribution of gas phase fraction, Sauter mean bubble diameter ( ), number density function (NDF), dissolved oxygen (DO) evolution, and flow structure. The numerical results are compared with experimental data and a fair agreement is achieved. The results of the axial impeller are discussed based on four impeller rotational speeds with different volumetric mass transfer coefficients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".