MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

PYRAMID Registry: Long-term Safety of Adalimumab by Age in Patients With Crohnʼs Disease

2017· article· en· W2913542462 on OpenAlexaff
Jean‐Frédéric Colombel, Geert D’Haens, Walter Reinisch, Edward V. Loftus, Remo Panaccione, Jack Satsangi, Gabriela Alperovich, Sofie Berg, Jasmina Kalabic, Mareike Bereswill, Joel Petersson, Anne Robinson

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAdalimumabInternal medicineCrohn's diseaseAdverse effectPediatricsSurgeryDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The global post-marketing observational registry PYRAMID assessed the long-term safety and effectiveness of adalimumab (ADA) as used in routine clinical practice in patients (pts) with moderate to severe Crohn's disease (CD). Methods: Enrolled Pts were newly prescribed or currently receiving ADA according to local product label; pts were followed up to 6 yrs. This analysis assessed the long-term safety of ADA by age subgroups (< 40, 40-59, and ≥60 yrs) at registry enrolment (baseline [BL]). Registry treatment-emergent (TE) adverse events (AEs), (any event with onset on/after first dose of ADA in the registry up to 70 days after last ADA injection) are reported as events per 100 patient-yrs (PY). Results: 5025 pts in the registry received at least one dose of ADA and included in the analysis; at BL, 2981 pts (59.3%) were < 40 yrs (female, 57.1%; median age, 29.0 yrs; median CD duration, 7.0 yrs), 1717 pts (34.2%) were 40-59 yrs (female, 57.8%; median age, 47.0 yrs; median CD duration, 13.0 yrs) and 327 pts (6.5%) were ≥60 yrs (female, 52.9%; median age, 64.0 yrs; median CD duration, 13.5 yrs). Of those ≥60 yrs at BL, 23/327 (7.0%) were ≥75 yrs. Cumulative registry ADA exposure by BL age groups was 9681.1 PY (< 40 yrs), 6009.3 PY (40-59 yrs) and 990.0 PY (≥60 yrs). Approximately 46-52% of pts were receiving ADA monotherapy (without immunomodulators or corticosteroids) at BL across age groups. Rates of any registry TEAEs, including serious AEs and AEs of special interest, by age groups at BL are shown in Table 1. Similar rates of registry TE serious infections and opportunistic infections were observed across younger age groups, but numerically higher in the ≥60 yrs group. Rates of any registry TE malignancies and non-melanoma skin cancer were significantly higher in older pts (≥60 yrs at BL). There was no event of lymphoma reported in aged ≥60 yrs at BL group; however, during the follow-up in the registry, 3 pts classified in the 40-59 yrs at BL age group were diagnosed with lymphoma when they were ≥60 yrs. No pts in the ≥60 yrs group reported active/latent tuberculosis.Table: Table. Cumulative incidence of registry treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs)Conclusion: Long-term treatment with ADA was well tolerated in pts with moderate to severe CD, irrespective of patient age. Rate of exposure-adjusted registry TEAEs (per 100 PY) was generally higher in older (≥60 yrs) compared to younger pts (< 60 yrs); however, no new safety signals were identified in this age group.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→