MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2913690647 · doi:10.1161/str.50.suppl_1.wmp120

Abstract WMP120: The Role of Age, Lesion Location and Volume in Predicting Long-Term Neurological Outcomes in Pediatric Ischemic Stroke

2019· article· en· W2913690647 on OpenAlexaff
Jaspal Singh, Pradeep Krishnan, Mahmoud Slim, Ann‐Marie Pontigon, Julie Paterson, Mahendranath Moharir, Daune MacGregor, Nomazulu Dlamini, Robyn Westmacott, Gabrielle deVeber

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStroke (engine)Pediatric strokeLesionLogistic regressionMiddle cerebral arteryNeuroimagingPediatricsCardiologyInternal medicineSurgeryIschemic strokeIschemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The balance of plasticity versus vulnerability to acute ischemic injury in the immature brain across development remains controversial. We aimed to investigate the relationship between age at stroke and lesion location and volume with long-term outcomes following arterial ischaemic stroke (AIS). Hypothesis: Age at stroke onset interacts with lesion location and volume to predict long-term neurological outcomes. Methods: In a single-centre prospective study, children aged term birth to 18 years with acute symptomatic AIS from 1992 to 2016 who underwent neuroimaging (CT/MRI) within 14 days of stroke onset were studied. Long term outcomes were assessed with the Pediatric Stroke Outcome Measure (PSOM). Outcomes were defined as normal (score 0-0.5 on 1-5 PSOM subscales), otherwise abnormal. AIS lesions were classified based on major (anterior, middle, posterior, other) cerebral arteries and branch sub-territories (e.g. MCA-lateral lenticulostriate). For each vascular territory, the proportion of infarcted brain was estimated as ‘small’ (≤50% territory) or ‘large’ (>50% territory). Factors predictive of long term outcomes were evaluated using logistic regression models. Results: Among 285 children, median age at stroke onset was 22 months (IQR: 0.03-101), 41% were females. PSOM scoring at median 9 years (IQR: 4-15) post-stroke was normal in 61%. Abnormal outcome was associated with age 1-4 years (OR=2.2, 95% CI: 1.02-4.9), ‘large’ proportion infarcts involving cortex within any major artery territory (OR=6.1, 95% CI: 2.6-14.4), and subcortical infarcts: OR= 2.7 (95% CI: 1.4-5.4) for small proportion infarcts; OR=8.3 (95% CI: 4.2-16.6) for large proportion infarcts in either medial or lateral lenticulostriate arteries; OR=15.8 (95% CI: 5-50.3) for large volume lesions in both lenticulostriate territories. In multivariate logistic regression, age, cortical and subcortical infarcts predicted long-term neurologic outcomes. Conclusions: In addition to age at stroke onset, infarct location including volume plays a key role in predicting long-term neurological outcomes in children. While the relationship between age and neurological outcomes seems to be bimodal, a linear effect of lesion volume on stroke outcomes is evident.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management→French-language works237,207→