A DFT/ZORA Study of Cadmium Magnetic Shielding Tensors: Analysis of Relativistic Effects and Electronic-State Approximations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Theoretical considerations are discussed for the accurate prediction of cadmium magnetic shielding tensors using relativistic density functional theory (DFT). Comparison is made between calculations that model the extended lattice of the cadmium-containing solids using periodic boundary conditions and pseudopotentials with calculations that use clusters of atoms. The all-electron cluster-based calculations afford an opportunity to examine the importance of (i) relativistic effects on cadmium magnetic shielding tensors, as introduced through the ZORA Hamiltonian at either the scalar (SC) or spin–orbit (SO) levels and (ii) variation in the class of the DFT approximation. Twenty-three combinations of pseudopotentials or all-electron methods, DFT functionals, and relativistic treatments are assessed for the prediction of the principal components of the magnetic shielding tensors of 30 cadmium sites. We find that the inclusion of SO coupling can increase the cadmium magnetic shielding by as much as ca. 1100 ppm for a certain principal values; these effects are most pronounced for cadmium sites featuring bonds to other heavy atoms such as cadmium, iodine, or selenium. The best agreement with experimental values is found at the ZORA SO level in combination with a hybrid DFT method featuring a large admixture of Hartree–Fock exchange such as BH&HLYP. Finally, a theoretical examination is presented of the magnetic shielding tensor of the Cd(I) site in Cd2(AlCl4)2.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".