Functional Outcome, Cognitive and Coping in Stroke Ischemic Survivors after Three MonthsOnset: Comparison between Post Stroke Depression and Non-Post Stroke Depression Groups
Bibliographic record
Abstract
10 Invited Lectures Functional Outcome, Cognitive and Coping in Stroke Ischemic Survivors after Three Months Onset: Comparison between Post Stroke Depression and Non- Post Stroke Depression Groups Fitria Handayani1 Setyowati2 Dwi Pudjonarko3 Dian Ratna Sawitri 4 1Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia 2Faculty of Nursing, University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia 3Neurology Study Program, Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia 4Faculty of Psychology, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia Corresponding email: fitriaha@yahoo.co.id ABSTRACT Introduction: The functional outcome, cognitive, and coping were correlated with PSD among stroke survivors after three months onset. Studies comparing cognitive, functional outcome and coping between ischemic survivors after three months onset who are experiencing PSD and who are not were not well established. This study aimed to compare the functional outcome, cognitive, and coping between PSD and Non-PSD in Stroke Ischemic Survivor after three months onset and to demonstrate Odd Ratio Methods: It was cross sectional study, which was conducted in outpatient services. The questionnaires were GRID-HAMD 17 for measuring PSD, Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE), Barthel-Index (BI) and Medical Coping Modes Questionnaire (MCMQ). Statistical analysis was Mann-Whitney U was used to analysis the total score and crosstab was used to demonstrate the odd ratio. The ethical approval was obtained from faculty and hospital ethics committee. Results: We involved 77 stroke ischemic survivors after three months onset. The prevalence of PSD was 58.5. The MMSE (z=-2.37, p=.001), BI (z=-2.39, p=.016), coping confrontation (z=- 2.583, p=.01) and coping acceptance resignation (z=-3.115, p=.002) in PSD and Non-PSD groups were significantly different. Meanwhile, coping avoidance (z=-1.385, p=.165) was not significance. Stroke ischemic survivor with MMSE <27 (p=.19, OR=3.279, 95%CI 1.061 - 10.135), BI ≤60(p=.014, OR=5.333, 95%CI 1.402 – 20.292), high score coping confrontation (p=.17, OR=.3.536 95%CI 1.352 – 9.247) and low score coping acceptance resignation score (p=.006, OR=5.165 95% CI 1.687 – 15.815) was risk for experiencing of PSD. Meanwhile coping avoidance (p=.326, OR=1.759, 95%CI, .704 – 4.384) was not. Conclusion: This study has provided good estimates for the exposure rate of cognitive, functional outcome and coping among stroke ischemic survivors after three months onset with PSD. This study suggests important initial insights for complex nursing interventions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".