MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The Effectiveness of Zoster Vaccine in Patients Subsequently Treated With Tofacitinib

2017· article· en· W2913781240 on OpenAlexaff
Kevin Winthrop, Ann Wouters, Ernest Choy, Chudy I. Nduaka, Pinaki Biswas, Lisy Wang, Jennifer Hodge, Irina Lazariciu, Koshika Soma, Christopher F. Mojcik, William F. C. Rigby

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHerpesvirus Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTofacitinibMedicineRheumatoid arthritisPlaceboInternal medicineJanus kinase inhibitorVaricella zoster virusCohortAbataceptUlcerative colitisImmunosuppressionRandomized controlled trialSurgeryGastroenterologyDermatologyImmunologyRituximabDiseaseVirus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Tofacitinib is an oral, small molecule JAK inhibitor approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) currently being investigated for several immune-mediated inflammatory diseases incl. ulcerative colitis. Patients (pts) with these conditions can be at increased risk for herpes zoster (HZ). Live zoster vaccine (LZV) has shown 70% and 51% efficacy in immunocompetent adults aged 50-59 and ≥60 years, respectively.1 LZV is recommended to be used in pts over 50 years old prior to starting immunosuppression with biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.2,3 We recently documented this vaccine to provide adequate immune responses in RA pts receiving methotrexate prior to starting tofacitinib.4 Here, we report long-term follow-up data of this cohort evaluating the effectiveness of LZV. Methods: The initial study involved 112 RA pts given LZV and randomized 2-3 weeks (wks) later to tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily (BID) or placebo for 12 wks (NCT02147587). At 14 wks, pts were offered inclusion in the long-term extension study ORAL Sequel (NCT00413699) at doses of either 5 or 10 mg BID. From this cohort, we calculated incidence of HZ after tofacitinib start, up to 27 months after. Among HZ cases, we analyzed varicella zoster virus (VZV)-specific immunity with average immunity after LZV. Results: Of 112 randomized pts (placebo, n=57; 5 mg BID, n=55), 100 continued to receive tofacitinib in ORAL Sequel. Five cases (not adjudicated) of HZ occurred at 202, 267, 702, 699, 446 days after initiation of tofacitinib in Cases 1-5, respectively. Cases #1-4 were monodermatomal; #5 involved 5 dermatomes; all resolved with treatment. Cases #1, #4, and #5 had undetectable VZV cell-mediated immunity (measured by ELISPOT) at baseline (BL) and Wk 6 post-vaccination, indicating a lack of VZV-specific immunity. Cases #2 and #3 responded adequately to vaccination by both immunoglobulin G (IgG) and ELISPOT measures, but had lower than average VZV IgG levels at BL and Wk 6. Conclusion: LZV prior to treatment with tofacitinib is effective at boosting IgG levels and cell-mediated immunity towards VZV. Of the 5 pts who developed HZ, 3 did not have any cell-mediated response and 2 had a low humoral response. Funded by Pfizer Inc.Table: Table. VZV ELISPOT and IgG levels

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology→Same topicHerpesvirus Infections and Treatments→French-language works237,207→