MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Impact of an inter-professional clinic on pancreatic cancer outcomes: The Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (PM) experience.

2019· article· en· W2913822346 on OpenAlexaff
Hamzeh Albaba, Anna Dodd, Rebecca M. Prince, Kyaw Aung, David W. Hedley, Steven Gallinger, John Kim, James D. Brierley, Shari Moura, Stephanie Moignard, Adriana Fraser, Shawn Hutchinson, Osvaldo Espin‐Garcia, Carol-Anne Moulton, Alice C. Wei, Paul D. Greig, I. McGilvray, Neesha C. Dhani, Elena Elimova, Jennifer J. Knox

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health NetworkPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineReferralPancreatic cancerStage (stratigraphy)PsychosocialCancerInternal medicineRadiation therapyFamily medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

444 Background: Patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have limited treatment options. Management of complex symptoms and psychosocial implications requires an interprofessional approach as prognosis is often measured in months. A multidisciplinary approach has been associated with improvement in clinical outcomes including survival. We aimed to evaluate the impact of an inter-professional approach for PDAC patients at the Wallace McCain Centre for Pancreatic Cancer (WMCPC) at PM on their management and clinical outcomes. Methods: We undertook retrospective review of all patients with PDAC seen at PM two years before (July ‘12 – June ‘14) and two years after (July ‘14 – June ‘16) establishment of the WMCPC. Standard therapies (surgical approach, chemotherapy, radiation therapy) were the same during both time periods. Comparison of overall survival (OS), stage at diagnosis, surgical outcomes, waiting times, and proportion seen by social worker, dietician and clinical nurse specialist (CNS) was explored with descriptive statistic and survival analysis. Results: A total of 993 patients were reviewed; 482 patients pre- and 511 patients post-WMCPC. Age (median 67 yrs), sex (54% men) and stage III/IV (52%) were similar in both groups. There was a trend to improved OS in the post-WMCPC group (9.6 vs. 10.9 m; p = 0.055); multivariable analysis found a significant improvement in OS after adjustment for performance status and stage (p = 0.023; HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.72-0.98). Rate of R0 versus R1/R2 resection for curative surgery (n = 264, 28%) was similar in both groups. Time from referral to first clinic visit significantly decreased from 13.4 to 8.8 days in the post-WMCPC group (p < 0.001) as did time from first clinic appointment to diagnostic biopsy (25.9 vs. 16.9 days, p = 0.022). Patients in the post-WMCPC were more frequently seen by a social worker, dietician or CNS (8% vs. 38%, 9% vs. 35% and 31% vs. 50% respectively, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Establishment of an interprofessional clinic for the treatment of PDAC patients at PM has streamlined diagnosis, aided symptom management and improved overall survival. This has implications for planning care delivery models and proves the value of this intervention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.173
GPT teacher head0.584
Teacher spread0.411 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research→French-language works237,207→