MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 17116: Incidence and Outcomes of Out-of-hospital Maternal Cardiac Arrest and Compliance With Resuscitation Guidelines

2015· article· en· W2913831873 on OpenAlexaff
Alan A Lipowicz, Sheldon Cheskes, Sarah Gray, Farida M. Jeejeebhoy, Janice Lee, Damon C. Scales, Cathy Zhan, Laurie J. Morrison

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Health Science CentreWilliam Osler Health SystemSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiopulmonary resuscitationResuscitationIncidence (geometry)PopulationEmergency medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Published survival rates after out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA) are lower than in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA). Current estimates for the incidence and rate of survival for maternal cardiac arrest are published only for IHCA. There are no studies that report the incidence and outcomes of maternal OHCA. Current cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines contain specific maternal recommendations, although compliance with recommended benchmarks has not been reported. The objective of this study was to report maternal OHCA incidence, outcomes, and compliance with resuscitation and maternal specific guidelines. Methods: This was a population-based cohort study of consecutive maternal OHCA between May 2010 and April 2014. The denominator was estimated from the total regional population of all women of childbearing age obtained from census and age-specific pregnancy rates provided by regional health authorities. Resuscitation performance was measured against the 2010 AHA Guidelines. Results: A total of 6 maternal OHCA occurred amongst 1,085 OHCA occurring in females of child bearing age (15-49) over 4yrs; Incidence-1.85:100,000 (95% CI 1.76 to 1.95) vs. 19.4 per 100,000 (95% CI, 19.37 to 19.43). Maternal and neonatal survival to discharge was 16.7% and 33.3%, respectively. Compliance with CPR quality metrics averaged 83% with a range from 75% to 100%. Compliance with maternal-specific resuscitation guidelines averaged 46.9%, with a range from 0% to 100%. The only performance metrics with 100% compliance was intravenous line insertion above the diaphragm and prehospital activation of the maternal cardiac arrest team. Uterine displacement compliance was low at 0%. Conclusion: The incidence of maternal OHCA was 1.85:100,000, which is lower than the published estimate for maternal IHCA. Survival after OHCA for mother and for child was higher than OHCA occurring in non-pregnant adult females of child bearing age; however, the number of survivors was small (<5). Compliance rates with recommended resuscitation guidelines were high, yet compliance with maternal-specific guidelines were low suggesting targeted training and implementation optimization at the point of care is required to prepare for this rare event involving two lives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation→French-language works237,207→