MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Integrated Efficacy and Safety of Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir to Treat HCV Genotype 1-6 Infection in Patients Without Cirrhosis Including HIV Co-Infection

2017· article· en· W2913849210 on OpenAlexaff
David Bernstein, Graham R. Foster, Douglas E. Dylla, Stefan Mauss, David R. Nelson, Tarik Asselah, Steven L. Flamm, Curtis Cooper, Ran Liu, Rolando M. Viani, Stanley Wang, Federico Mensa, Mark Sulkowski

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatitis C virus research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSofosbuvirInternal medicineRegimenRibavirinGastroenterologyCirrhosisHepatitis C virusImmunologyVirus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Glecaprevir, an NS3/4A protease inhibitor (developed by AbbVie and Enanta) and pibrentasvir (NS5A inhibitor), collectively G/P, is a once-daily, pangenotypic, direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimen shown to be efficacious in the treatment of all major genotypes (GT) of hepatitis C virus (HCV). Here, we present an integrated efficacy and safety analysis of 8-, 12-, and 16-week durations of G/P in non-cirrhotic HCV GT 1-6 patients, including those with HIV co-infection. Methods: Data were pooled from the SURVEYOR-I and -II and ENDURANCE-1, -2, -3, and -4, and EXPEDITION-2 and -4 studies. Patients were either treatment-naïve or treatment-experienced with interferon (IFN), pegIFN ± ribavirin (RBV), or sofosbuvir (SOF) + RBV ± pegIFN. Patients with experience to a DAA other than SOF were excluded. Patients with GT1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 infection received 8 or 12 weeks of G/P regardless of treatment history, whereas treatment-experienced GT3-infected patients received 16 weeks of G/P. Efficacy was evaluated as the rate of sustained virologic response (HCV RNA < lower limit of quantification) at 12 weeks post-treatment (SVR12) using a modified intent-to-treat analysis excluding those not achieving SVR for reasons other than virologic failure. Safety was assessed in all patients. Results: In total, 2063 chronic HCV patients without cirrhosis were included in the analysis comprised of 55% (1135/2063) males, 79% (1639/2063) white race, 24% (494/2063) treatment experienced, and 8% (170/2063) HIV co-infected. SVR12 rates are shown in Figure 1 according to treatment duration and genotype. In the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population, overall SVR12 rates were 99.1% for the 8-week (943/952) and 99.6% for the 12-week groups (1060/1064). The SVR12 rate was 95% (21/22) for treatment-experienced GT3 patients receiving 16-weeks of G/P. In patients with HIV co-infection, 100% (169/169) of patients achieved SVR12. Overall, G/P was well-tolerated with 1 (< 0.1%) DAA-related serious adverse events and 10 (0.5%) adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation.Figure: mITT Analysis of Integrated Efficacy for 8-, 12-, and 16-week G/P treatment.Conclusion: G/P for 8, 12, and 16 weeks in chronic HCV GT1-6 infected patients without cirrhosis was well-tolerated and achieved high SVR12 rates. These data suggest that the majority of patients without cirrhosis can be treated for 8 weeks with G/P.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology→Same topicHepatitis C virus research→French-language works237,207→