MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2913894837 · doi:10.1029/2018jd029373

Characterization and Quantification of Atmospheric Mercury Sources Using Passive Air Samplers

2019· article· en· W2913894837 on OpenAlexafffund
David S. McLagan, Fabrizio Monaci, Haiyong Huang, Ying Duan Lei, Carl P. J. Mitchell, Frank Wania

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMercury impact and mitigation studies
Canadian institutionsThe Scarborough HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceMercury (programming language)AdvectionSpatial distributionTerrainSpatial variabilityAtmospheric sciencesMeteorologyRemote sensingGeographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Minamata Convention on Mercury (Hg) requires improved atmospheric Hg monitoring and characterization of Hg sources. Here we demonstrate how a network of passive air samplers (PASs) can be used cost effectively to determine the spatial distribution of gaseous Hg and estimate atmospheric Hg emissions at contaminated sites. Gaseous Hg concentrations were mapped around a former Hg mine in the Monte Amiata district in Italy using simultaneous deployments of PASs across local and regional spatial scale grids. The concentration maps help visualize with great detail and precision the dispersal of gaseous Hg from a contaminated site, revealing even subtle effects of wind, season, and minor sources. Emissions estimated from the empirical data (80 ± 40 and 150 ± 75 kg/year for October and July, respectively) were robust to changes in the most uncertain parameters (excess Hg in the air above the mine and advection rate) and compared well to previous estimates for this and other closed Hg mines. This PAS‐based approach has a number of advantages: (i) concurrent deployments of multiple samplers constrain concentration changes to spatial variability only, (ii) time‐averaged data over longer periods negate biases related to short‐term, infrequent measurements, (iii) more spatially representative estimates of Hg distributions and emissions can be made at a fraction of the cost, and (iv) use is easy, especially in difficult terrain. Time‐averaged data across a broad area are also most pertinent for assessing chronic human exposure, especially in terms of the inhalation of Hg by workers and residents living close to contaminated sites.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.842
Threshold uncertainty score0.584

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations68
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresSame topicMercury impact and mitigation studiesFrench-language works237,207