MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2913914661 · doi:10.1093/jmammal/gyz005

Habitat use and activity patterns of <i>Puma concolor</i> in a human-dominated landscape of central Argentina

2019· article· en· W2913914661 on OpenAlexfundno aff
María de las Mercedes Guerisoli, Nicolás Caruso, Estela Maris Luengos Vidal, Mauro Lucherini

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mammalogy · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Ecology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSecretaría de Ciencia y Técnica, Universidad de Buenos AiresUniversidad Nacional del SurInstituto Nacional de Tecnología AgropecuariaConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y TécnicasUniversité de Sherbrooke
KeywordsHabitatEcologyGeographyPumaWoodlandPoachingBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Habitat loss, poaching, and legal hunting are the main causes of decline in populations of pumas (Puma concolor) globally.We used camera trapping to assess the habitat use and daily activity patterns of pumas, and we identified the major factors affecting this species, in a human-dominated landscape in central Argentina.The intensity of habitat use by pumas was related positively to the presence of woodland, habitat complexity, and richness of wild prey.Pumas also avoided areas with a high concentration of ranches, indicators of more-intense human activity.Although some seasonal variation was detected in the activity patterns, pumas clearly preferred nighttime hours.We conclude that human-related factors strongly affect habitat use and activity of pumas in central Argentina's rangelands.La pérdida de hábitat y la caza ilegal y legal son las principales causas de la disminución de las poblaciones de puma a lo largo de su distribución.Aún cuando este felino se caracteriza por una gran plasticidad ecológica, los factores que afectan su supervivencia en áreas altamente modificadas por el hombre son poco conocidos.En este trabajo, se utilizó el trampeo fotográfico para determinar el uso de hábitat, el patrón de actividad del puma y los factores que pueden afectar a esta especie en un paisaje dominado por las actividades antrópicas en el centro de Argentina.La intensidad del uso del hábitat de los pumas fue favorecida por la presencia de bosque semi-cerrado, la complejidad de hábitat y la riqueza de presas silvestres.Además, los pumas evitaron las áreas con una elevada densidad de propiedades, la cual fue considerada como un indicador de una mayor actividad humana.Si bien se identificaron variaciones estacionales en el patrón de actividad, los pumas prefirieron claramente las horas nocturnas.Concluimos que los factores antrópicos parecen afectar fuertemente el uso del hábitat y los patrones de actividad del puma en un área ganadera del centro de Argentina.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.110

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of MammalogySame topicWildlife Ecology and ConservationFrench-language works237,207