Submaximal exercise cardiac output is increased by 4 weeks of sprint interval training in young healthy males with low initial Q-VO2: Importance of cardiac response phenotype
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cardiovascular adaptations to exercise, particularly at the individual level, remain poorly understood. Previous group level research suggests the relationship between cardiac output and oxygen consumption ([Formula: see text]-[Formula: see text]) is unaffected by training as submaximal [Formula: see text] is unchanged. We recently identified substantial inter-individual variation in the exercise [Formula: see text]-[Formula: see text] relationship that was correlated to stroke volume (SV) as opposed to arterial oxygen content. Therefore we explored the effects of sprint interval training (SIT) on modulating [Formula: see text]-[Formula: see text] given an individual's specific [Formula: see text]-[Formula: see text] relationship. 22 (21±2 yrs) healthy, recreationally active males participated in a 4-week SIT (8, 20 second sprints; 4x/week, 170% of the work rate at [Formula: see text] peak) study with progressive exercise tests (PET) until exhaustion. Cardiac output ([Formula: see text] L/min; inert gas rebreathe, Finometer Modelflow™), oxygen consumption ([Formula: see text] L/min; breath-by-breath pulmonary gas exchange), quadriceps oxygenation (near infrared spectroscopy) and exercise tolerance (6-20; Borg Scale RPE) were measured throughout PET both before and after training. Data are mean Δ from bsl±SD. Higher [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text]) and lower [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text]) responders were identified post hoc (n = 8/group). SIT increased the [Formula: see text]-[Formula: see text] post-training in [Formula: see text] (3.8±0.2 vs. 4.7±0.2; P = 0.02) while [Formula: see text] was unaffected (5.8±0.1 vs. 5.3±0.6; P = 0.5). [Formula: see text] was elevated beyond 80 watts in [Formula: see text] due to a greater increase in SV (all P<0.04). Peak [Formula: see text] (ml/kg/min) was increased in [Formula: see text] (39.7±6.7 vs. 44.5±7.3; P = 0.015) and [Formula: see text] (47.2±4.4 vs. 52.4±6.0; P = 0.009) following SIT, with [Formula: see text] having a greater peak [Formula: see text] both pre (P = 0.02) and post (P = 0.03) training. Quadriceps muscle oxygenation and RPE were not different between groups (all P>0.1). In contrast to [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] responders are capable of improving submaximal [Formula: see text]-[Formula: see text] in response to SIT via increased SV. However, the increased submaximal exercise [Formula: see text] does not benefit exercising muscle oxygenation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".