MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2913966360 · doi:10.1002/pld3.100

Genome‐wide occupancy of histone H3K27 methyltransferases <scp>CURLY LEAF</scp> and <scp>SWINGER</scp> in <i>Arabidopsis</i> seedlings

2019· article· en· W2913966360 on OpenAlexafffund
Jie Shu, Chen Chen, Raj Kumar Thapa, Shaomin Bian, Vi Nguyen, Kangfu Yu, Ze‐Chun Yuan, Jun Liu, Susanne E. Kohalmi, Chenlong Li, Yuhai Cui

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Direct · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Molecular Biology Research
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaWestern University
FundersChina Scholarship CouncilAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsArabidopsisMethyltransferaseGenomeHistoneBotanyOccupancyBiologyGeneticsMethylationGeneEcologyMutant

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Polycomb Group (PcG) proteins form two protein complexes, PcG Repressive Complex 1 ( PRC 1) and PRC 2, which are key epigenetic regulators in eukaryotes. PRC 2 represses gene expression by catalyzing the trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 27 (H3K27me3). In Arabidopsis ( Arabidopsis thaliana ), CURLY LEAF ( CLF ) and SWINGER ( SWN ) are two major H3K27 methyltransferases and core components of PRC 2, playing essential roles in plant growth and development. Despite their importance, genome‐wide binding profiles of CLF and SWN have not been determined and compared yet. In this study, we generated transgenic lines expressing GFP ‐tagged CLF / SWN under their respective native promoters and used them for Ch IP ‐seq analyses to profile the genome‐wide distributions of CLF and SWN in Arabidopsis seedlings. We also profiled and compared the global H3K27me3 levels in wild‐type ( WT ) and PcG mutants ( clf , swn , and clf swn ). Our data show that CLF and SWN bind to almost the same set of genes, except that SWN has a few hundred more targets. Two short DNA sequences, the GAGA ‐like and Telo ‐box‐like motifs, were found enriched in the CLF and SWN binding regions. The H3K27me3 levels in clf , but not in swn , were markedly reduced compared with WT ; and the mark was undetectable in the clf swn double mutant. Further, we profiled the transcriptomes in clf , swn , and clf swn, and compared that with WT . Thus this work provides a useful resource for the plant epigenetics community for dissecting the functions of PRC 2 in plant growth and development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.522
Threshold uncertainty score0.592

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations119
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant DirectSame topicPlant Molecular Biology ResearchFrench-language works237,207