Thermal dependence of size-at-hatch in the lake whitefish (<i>Coregonus clupeaformis</i>)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lake whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis) embryos incubated at low temperatures have a longer incubation period and hatch at a significantly greater size than those incubated at warmer temperatures. We examined hatch timing and morphological characteristics for whitefish embryos reared under different constant and varying temperatures to determine whether the thermal dependence of hatching size reflects differences in their development stage. Our results show that lake whitefish embryos hatch at different temperature-dependent developmental stages, and this is the dominant factor affecting size-at-hatch. The term “heterograde” is proposed for the thermal dependence of hatching stage to differentiate it from hatching that occurs at a fixed developmental stage. A method to quantify this effect is given using a ratio that describes the difference in relative development at hatching between different viable constant incubation temperatures. Heterograde hatching is proposed as a possible mechanism to synchronize the timing of hatch to the break-up of winter ice cover despite variability in the date of spawning and in the onset of spring break-up.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".