MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2913994888 · doi:10.7939/r3qj7883w

Nitrous Oxide Emission Reduction in an Annual Cropping System as a function of Nitrification Inhibitors and Liquid Manure Injection Timings

2016· article· en· W2913994888 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sisi Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCrop Yield and Soil Fertility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNitrous oxideNitrificationEnvironmental scienceLiquid manureReduction (mathematics)AgronomyCroppingManureNitrogenAgricultureChemistryBiologyMathematicsEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nitrous oxide (N2O) contributes to global warming and ozone depletion. Two-thirds of the global N2O emissions are derived from agricultural soils receiving manure or fertilizer applications. The goal of this study was to identify and develop management practices that can decrease N2O emissions from manured soils. We tested two times of liquid manure injections (early fall versus late spring) and two nitrification inhibitors (NIs; nitrapyrin vs. DMPP). We conducted two field experiments in central Alberta (Lacombe and Edmonton), Canada over a period of 13 months and a 28-day laboratory incubation. Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) for silage was planted, and productivity and N uptake were recorded. Soil ammonium and nitrate concentrations and N2O fluxes were repeatedly monitored. First-order kinetic models represented well mineral N transformations in both field and incubation experiments, with the exception of fast nitrate depletion rates which were better depicted by second-order models. Compared to the controls, field N2O emissions were increased by manure application (on average 3.15 vs. 0.48 kg N ha-1 yr-1 at both sites), but emissions were sharply reduced with NIs. For instance, in our Lacombe site, fall manure treated with DMPP reduced annual N2O emissions by 81%, and nitrapyrin reduced emissions by 58%. The emission reductions caused by NIs were also evident in the spring manure field treatments, our incubation, and at our Edmonton site, but the reductions were in general smaller possibly due to prevailing drier conditions - in particular during mid spring in Edmonton. Compared to the spring manure timing, fall manure without NIs resulted in an approximate two-fold increase in N2O emissions, due to major peak fluxes following the early spring snow-melt, which accounted for at least 65% of the annual N2O emissions. Fall manure timing also reduced plant productivity and N uptake. In summary, spring-applied manure with NIs can mitigate N2O emissions in Alberta’s agriculture and in regions with comparable agro-ecological conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.866
Threshold uncertainty score0.722

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.164
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Alberta LibrarySame topicCrop Yield and Soil FertilityFrench-language works237,207