Bibliographic record
Abstract
There is widespread disagreement about how the general covariance of a theory affects its quantization. Without a complete quantum theory of gravity, one can examine quantum consequences of coordinate choices only in highly idealized ``toy'' models. In this work, we extend our previous analysis of a self-gravitating shell model [C. Gooding and W. G. Unruh, Self-gravitating interferometry and intrinsic decoherence, Phys. Rev. D 90, 044071 (2014)] and demonstrate that coordinate freedom can be retained in a reduced phase space description of the system. We first consider a family of coordinate systems discussed by Martel and Poisson [K. Martel and E. Poisson, Regular coordinate systems for Schwarzschild and other spherical spacetimes, Am. J. Phys. 69, 476 (2001)], which have time coordinates that coincide with the proper times of ingoing and outgoing geodesics (for concreteness, we only consider the former). Included in this family are Painlev\'e-Gullstrand coordinates, related to a network of infalling observers that are asymptotically at rest, and Eddington-Finkelstein coordinates, related to a network of infalling observers that travel at the speed of light. We then introduce inflying coordinates---a hybrid coordinate system that allows the infalling observers to be arbitrarily boosted from one member of the aforementioned family to another. We perform a phase space reduction using inflying coordinates with an unspecified boosting function, resulting in a reduced theory with residual coordinate freedom. Finally, we discuss quantization, and comment on the utility of the reduced system for the study of coordinate effects and the role of observers in quantum gravity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".