Non-coding Somatic Mutations Converge on the PAX8 Pathway in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Transcriptional regulation is highly disease and cell-type specific. We performed H3K27ac chromatin immunoprecipitation and transcriptomic sequencing in primary tumors for the four different subtypes of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer (OC). Histotype-specific regulatory elements (REs) were enriched in enhancers (P<0.001). In silico prediction of putative target genes for histotype-specific REs identified genes ( WFDC2 , P=5.5×10 -5 ) and pathways (PI3K-Akt signaling, P<0.002) known to be involved in OC development. Some genes (e.g. PAX8 and CA125 ) are associated with super-enhancers (SEs) in all OCs, while others are histotype-specific, including PPP1R3B which is associated with SEs specific to clear cell OC. Integrated analysis of active chromatin landscapes with somatic single nucleotide variants (SNVs) from whole genome sequencing (WGS) of 232 primary OCs identified frequently mutated REs, including the KLF6 promoter (P=8.2×10 -8 ) and a putative enhancer at chromosome 6p22.1 (P<0.05). In high-grade serous OCs, somatic SNVs clustered in binding sites for the PAX8 binding partner TEAD4 (P=6×10 -11 ), while the collection of cis regulatory elements associated with PAX8 was the most frequently mutated set of enhancers in OC (P=0.003). Functional analyses supported our findings: Knockdown of PPP1R3B in clear cell OC cells significantly reduced intracellular glycogen content, a signature feature of this histotype; and stable knockout of a 635 bp region in the 6p22.1 enhancer induced downregulation of two predicted target genes, ZSCAN16 and ZSCAN12 (P=6.6 x 10 -4 and P=0.02). In summary, we have characterized histotype-specific epigenomic and transcriptomic landscapes in OC and defined likely functional REs based on somatic mutation analysis of ovarian tumors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".