Unravelling Phanerozoic evolution of radial to rosette trace fossils
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Feeding trace fossils, produced by either deposit or detritus feeders and showing radial to rosetted morphology, are all included in the same architectural category. These radial to rosette ichnofossils are widely recorded worldwide throughout the Phanerozoic and have attracted the attention of numerous ichnologists for decades. Construction of a database summarizing occurrences of radial to rosette trace fossils through the Phanerozoic shows that representatives of this category occurred for the first time during the Fortunian, which accounts for the appearance of at least 12% of the total number of ichnogenera in this category. Overall, 32% of all known rosette ichnogenera resulted from the Cambrian Explosion. A second ichnodiversity increase took place (20%) during the Ordovician. Subsequent to the Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event, this architectural category shows minor fluctuations in ichnodiversity resulting in a long-term plateau. The apparent decline in ichnodiversity by the end of the Cenozoic could reflect a taphonomic artefact resulting from the difficulties of identifying cumulative trace fossils in highly bioturbated modern sediments. Our data set indicates that several radial to rosette ichnogenera (e.g. Arenituba, Dactylophycus, Gyrophyllites, Phoebichnus, Volkichnium) occurred first in shallow-marine settings and then migrated to either deeper-water or marginal-marine environments, while others (e.g. Asterichnus, Cladichnus, Dactyloidites) apparently first occurred in deep-sea environments and then migrated to shallower waters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".