MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2914235778 · doi:10.2118/185043-pa

New Insights on Mechanisms Controlling Fracturing-Fluid Distribution and Their Effects on Well Performance in Shale-Gas Reservoirs

2019· article· en· W2914235778 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Production & Operations · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsNexen (Canada)University of Alberta
FundersCMG Reservoir Simulation Foundation
KeywordsFracture (geology)GeologyHydraulic fracturingPetrophysicsFracturing fluidFluid dynamicsPetroleum engineeringOil shaleFlow (mathematics)Geotechnical engineeringClosure (psychology)MechanicsPorosity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Many stimulated shale-gas wells experience surprisingly low fracturing-fluid recoveries. Fracture closure, gravity segregation, proppant distribution, and shut-in (soaking) time have been widely postulated to be the contributing factors. This study examines the effects of these factors on fracturing-fluid distribution and subsequent well performance using flow and geomechanical simulations. In the end, two real-field examples are used to validate the findings in this study. Geomechanical simulation is used to capture the complex post-closure fracture geometry caused by nonuniform proppant distribution. The geometry is then passed into a series of 3D numerical flow models that are constructed using petrophysical parameters, fluid properties, and operational constraints representative of the Horn River shale-gas reservoir. Within the flow simulation, the hydraulic fracture is represented explicitly in the computational domain by means of local-grid refinement, and the physical process of fracture closure during shut-in and production periods is modeled by adjusting the fracture volume and fracture conductivity dynamically. Non-Darcy behavior caused by high gas velocity in the fracture and matrix desorption are considered. The results of the geomechanical simulation confirm the formation of a residual opening above the proppant pack in a partially propped fracture. The residual opening offers a highly conductive flow path for the gas, which is much more mobile than the water-based fracturing fluid, and this difference in mobility further aggravates gravity segregation. Gravity segregation might lead to water accumulating near the bottom of a vertical planar fracture, but reduced fracture conductivity could limit the segregation and promote a more uniform fluid distribution. Water uptake into the matrix is influenced by forced and spontaneous imbibition caused by the large pressure differential across the matrix/fracture interface and matrix capillarity. Additional water is displaced into the matrix as pressure depletes and the fracture closes. Fracturing-fluid-penetration depth increases with shut-in time, resulting in an enhancement in the initial gas rate, but lower late-time production is also observed. Analysis of the residual opening of a partially propped fracture and its role in fracturing-fluid distribution in three dimensions is novel. Field examples suggest that considering the various physical mechanisms investigated in this study could improve the accuracy of the numerical model for history matching and the reliability of the ensuing production forecasting. The findings in this study might provide a better understanding of fracturing-fluid distribution, which is useful for optimizing production strategies and operations concerning hydraulically fractured shale-gas reservoirs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.397
Threshold uncertainty score0.668

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it