Determination of Healthy Life Style Behaviours of the Students in Middle-Adolescence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to determine healthy life style behaviours, such as average daily sleep duration, sporthabit, physical activity level and eating habits, of high school students in their middle adolescence (15-17 ages). Theresearch sample consists of 642 (n=338 male and n=304 female) volunteer students in a secondary educationinstitution in Konya city centre. The questionnaire formed by examining relevant literature has been used todetermine healthy life style behaviours.The average daily sleep duration of the students participating in the study is 8.30±1.26. 42.8% the of female studentsand 37.8% of the male students do not do sports. 69.8% of the female students and 74.6% of the male students usethe internet from their mobile phones during the day. The percentage of those who watch television 1-3 hours andmore a day is 85.6% for the female students and 81.6% for the male students. 28.2% of the female students and 30.2%of the male students skip meals. 38.8% of the female students and 36.1% of the male students have breakfast.Within the lights of the findings in the survey, it has been concluded that the students in middle adolescence do nothealthy life style behaviours sufficiently. The students do not consume the eatables that are healthy for them. Thefood stuffs, such as chips, chocolate, carbonated drinks and hamburgers, whose overconsumption is harmful to arefrequently consumed by students. It should not be forgotten that the eating habits obtained in the adolescence willaffect the adulthood period. Therefore, evaluating their nutritional status, adolescents should be gained adequate andbalanced nutrition habits. In the adoption of a healthy lifestyle, adequate balanced nutrition and physical activityshould be considered as a whole and, when required, a specialist health professional should be consulted for propernutritional advice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".