MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2914410118 · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2018.2865450

Convolutional Neural Network With Shape Prior Applied to Cardiac MRI Segmentation

2018· article· en· W2914410118 on OpenAlexaff
Clément Zotti, Zhiming Luo, Alain Lalande, Pierre‐Marc Jodoin

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMedical Image Segmentation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSegmentationConvolutional neural networkSørensen–Dice coefficientArtificial intelligenceVentricleEndocardiumMagnetic resonance imagingCardiac magnetic resonance imagingDeep learningHausdorff distancePattern recognition (psychology)Image segmentationComputer visionMedicineRadiologyCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present a novel convolutional neural network architecture to segment images from a series of short-axis cardiac magnetic resonance slices (CMRI). The proposed model is an extension of the U-net that embeds a cardiac shape prior and involves a loss function tailored to the cardiac anatomy. Since the shape prior is computed offline only once, the execution of our model is not limited by its calculation. Our system takes as input raw magnetic resonance images, requires no manual preprocessing or image cropping and is trained to segment the endocardium and epicardium of the left ventricle, the endocardium of the right ventricle, as well as the center of the left ventricle. With its multiresolution grid architecture, the network learns both high and low-level features useful to register the shape prior as well as accurately localize the borders of the cardiac regions. Experimental results obtained on the Automatic Cardiac Diagnostic Challenge - Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (ACDC-MICCAI) 2017 dataset show that our model segments multislices CMRI (left and right ventricle contours) in 0.18 s with an average Dice coefficient of [Formula: see text] and an average 3-D Hausdorff distance of [Formula: see text] mm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations209
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health InformaticsSame topicMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207