MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2914460825 · doi:10.1148/radiol.2019181674

CT-guided Microcoil Pulmonary Nodule Localization prior to Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: Diagnostic Utility and Recurrence-Free Survival

2019· article· en· W2914460825 on OpenAlexaff
Jonathan Rodrigues, Andrew F. Pierre, Kate Hanneman, Michael Cabanero, John Kavanagh, Thomas K. Waddell, TaeBong Chung, Mini Pakkal, Shaf Keshavjee, Marcelo Cypel, Kazuhiro Yasufuku, Elsie T. Nguyen

Bibliographic record

VenueRadiology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMicrocoilRadiologyThoracoscopyNodule (geology)Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgeryBiopsySolitary pulmonary noduleCardiothoracic surgeryAdenocarcinomaLungThoracotomySurgeryComputed tomographyCancerInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background CT-guided microcoil localization has been shown to reduce the need for thoracotomy or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) anatomic resection. However, only short-term follow-up after CT-guided microcoil localization and lung resection has been previously reported. Purpose To assess the diagnostic utility and recurrence-free survival over a minimum of 2 years following CT-guided microcoil localization and VATS. Materials and Methods Among 1950 VATS procedures performed in a single tertiary institution from October 2008 through April 2016, 124 consecutive patients with CT-guided microcoil localization were retrospectively evaluated. Patient demographics, nodule characteristics, and histopathologic findings were recorded. The primary end point was recurrence-free survival after 2 or more years of CT surveillance. Statistical analysis included Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox regression. Results In 124 patients (men, 35%; mean age, 65 years ± 12) with a nodule found at CT, microcoil localization and VATS resection were performed for a total of 126 nodules (mean size, 13 mm ± 6; mean distance to pleura, 20 mm ± 9). On presurgical CT evaluation, 42% (53 of 126) of nodules were solid, 33% (41 of 126) were ground glass, and 24% (30 of 126) were subsolid. VATS excisional biopsy altered cytopathologic diagnosis in 21% (five of 24) of patients with prior diagnostic premicrocoil CT-guided biopsy. At histopathologic examination, 17% (21 of 126) of the nodules were adenocarcinoma in situ, 17% (22 of 126) were minimally invasive adenocarcinoma, 30% (38 of 126) were invasive lung primary tumors, and 22% (28 of 126) were metastases. Among the 72 patients with malignancy at histopathologic examination and at least 2 years of CT surveillance, local recurrence occurred in 7% (five of 72), intrathoracic recurrence in 22% (16 of 72), and extrathoracic recurrence in 18% (13 of 72) after 2 or more years of CT surveillance. There was no recurrence for adenocarcinoma in situ, minimally invasive adenocarcinoma, or invasive lung tumors measuring less than 1 cm. After multivariable adjustment, nodule location at a distance greater than 10 mm from the pleura was an independent predictor of time to recurrence (hazard ratio, 2.9 [95% confidence interval: 1.1, 7.4]; P = .03). Conclusion CT-guided microcoil localization and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical resection alter clinical management and were associated with excellent recurrence-free survival for superficial premalignant, minimally invasive, and small invasive lung tumors. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.749

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRadiologySame topicLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207