MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract A041: LSD1 inhibition disrupts FOXA1-dependent AR cistrome

2018· article· en· W2914471889 on OpenAlexaff
Shuai Gao, Dong Han, Sujun Chen, Wanting Han, Housheng Hansen He, Steven P. Balk, Changmeng Cai

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFOXA1Transcription factorAndrogen receptorEnhancerChromatinBiologyDemethylaseCancer researchPioneer factorEpigeneticsEpigenomicsHistoneEpigenomeCell biologyProstate cancerGeneticsDNA methylationGeneGene expressionCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Targeting androgen receptor (AR) has been the mainstream therapy for treating prostate cancer (PCa); however, resolving the drug resistance remains a major hurtle. Even with FDA-approved second-generation antagonists against AR-axis signaling, AR activity is eventually restored in the lethal metastatic castration-resistant PCa (mCRPC). Therefore, novel strategies targeting AR signaling remain to be developed. One major mechanism that leads to the PCa development is reprogramming of AR cistrome by transcriptional factors and chromatin modifiers. In this process, AR is recruited to a subset of newly established enhancers that can drive the expression of proliferation genes. FOXA1 is one such transcriptional factor that determines cell lineage and is characterized as a “pioneer” factor to facilitate the access of additional transcription factors (such as AR or ER) to the regions with compact chromatin. However, the molecular basis of how FOXA1 was guided to bind to these regions remains unclear. Lysine specific demethylase 1 (LSD1, KDM1A) is an important epigenetic modifier that is well known for its repressor function through demethylating histone 3 lysine 4. In PCa, our genome-wide studies showed that LSD1 also functions as a major activator in mediating AR-dependent enhancers and facilitates the transcription of androgen-regulated genes. Our previous studies showed that LSD1 binding significantly overlaps with FOXA1, and these overlapping sites (marked with high H3K4me1,2) are enriched for regulating androgen-stimulated genes. We also showed that LSD1 interacts with FOXA1 and this interaction enhances binding of both proteins at those sites. These findings suggest that LSD1 may facilitate FOXA1 binding to chromatin and subsequently regulate the enhancer availability to AR-mediated transcription. In the current study, we first investigated the genomic landscape of LSD1 in PCa cells. Epigenomic profiling of LSD1 binding sites shows global enrichment of active enhancer markers with strong FOXA1 binding. Remarkably, the genome-wide FOXA1 binding was drastically diminished by inhibiting LSD1, indicating that its demethylase activity is absolutely required for FOXA1 binding to chromatin. Furthermore, LSD1 inhibition impaired the accessibility of AR-dependent enhancers. Using a LSD1 inhibitor that has entered clinical trials for lung cancer, we found that inhibiting LSD1 robustly disrupted androgen-induced AR genomic binding and transcriptional output and decreased PCa cell growth. Importantly, through this mechanism LSD1 inhibition also impairs AR-V7 chromatin binding in CRPC models and suppressed AR-V-driven tumor growth. Mechanistically, we hypothesized that FOXA1 may be a direct target of LSD1 and removing the lysing methylation stabilizes FOXA1 binding to chromatin. Mass-spec (LC/MS/MS) on immunoprecipitated FOXA1 in PCa cells resulted in the identification of methylated lys270 (located near Forkhead domain), where its methylation was increased by LSD1 inhibitor. Mutant FOXA1 (K270R) bound more tightly with chromatin and its binding was not affected by LSD1 inhibitor treatment. To further validate this mechanism, we are performing in vitro demethylase assay using synthetic peptides to confirm the LSD1-mediated demethylation on lys270. In summary, our results uncover a novel molecular mechanism of LSD1 action on FOXA1 chromatin binding, and reveal the global impact of LSD1-FOXA1 interaction on AR cistrome. This study will add another layer to the interplay between epigenetic modifiers and transcriptional factors and will provide important therapeutic implications of targeting LSD1 in PCa treatment. Citation Format: Shuai Gao, Dong Han, Sujun Chen, Wanting Han, Housheng Hansen He, Steven P. Balk, Changmeng Cai. LSD1 inhibition disrupts FOXA1-dependent AR cistrome [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Prostate Cancer: Advances in Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research; 2017 Dec 2-5; Orlando, Florida. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(16 Suppl):Abstract nr A041.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.126
GPT teacher head0.471
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research→French-language works237,207→