MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2914482644 · doi:10.1093/eurpub/cky047.098

3.3-O6Is the socioeconomic status of immigrant mothers in Brussels relevant to predict their risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes?

2018· article· en· W2914482644 on OpenAlexaff
Claudia Schoenborn, Mouctar Sow, Judith Racapé, M. De Spiegelaere

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Public Health · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMigration, Health and Trauma
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocioeconomic statusImmigrationPregnancyMedicineObstetricsEnvironmental healthDemographyGeographySociologyPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Understanding and tackling the social inequalities in perinatal health require taking into account the interaction between socioeconomic status (SES) and migration. Studies show that among certain migrant groups, education is not associated with the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. We aim to extend this analysis to further dimensions of SES and to other settings. Objectives: a) describe the socioeconomic profile of mothers living in Brussels; b) identify the sociodemographic characteristics associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, by maternal country of birth. Methods: We analysed all singleton live births in Brussels between 2005-2010 (n = 97 844). The data arise from the linkage between three administrative registers: births and deaths, national security, and the population register. Four groups of women were included according to country of birth: Belgium, EU, North Africa, and Sub-Saharan Africa. For each group, logistic regression was carried out to estimate the odds ratios of low birthweight (LBW) and small for gestation age according to: household income, maternal occupation, maternal education, and single parenthood. Results 25% of children were born into a household under the poverty threshold. This proportion was much higher for mothers born outside of the EU. For North African immigrants, three SES indicators (education, occupation, and income) didn’t influence the pregnancy outcomes, whereas their risk of LBW increased with single parenthood. For Sub-Saharan African mothers the risk of LBW increased with low household income. Conclusion: In a region where immigrant mothers are at high poverty risk, we observe a classic social gradient in perinatal outcomes only for mothers born in Belgium or the EU; in the other groups, SES influences perinatal outcomes less systematically. Main message: To develop interventions to reduce inequalities from birth, it’s important to identify the determinants of perinatal health among immigrants and to understand the underlying mechanisms in different contexts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.100

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Public HealthSame topicMigration, Health and TraumaFrench-language works237,207