MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2914602916 · doi:10.1161/str.50.suppl_1.wmp118

Abstract WMP118: The Association Between Sleep Related Breathing Disorders and Neuropsychological Function in Pediatric Stroke

2019· article· en· W2914602916 on OpenAlexaff
Mahmoud Slim, Robyn Westmacott, Elena Grbac, Sandra Toutounji, Indra Narang, Shelly K. Weiss, Ann‐Marie Pontigon, Jaspal Singh, Kathleen Andres, Daune MacGregor, Gabrielle deVeber, Mahendranath Moharir, Nomazulu Dlamini

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePediatric strokeStroke (engine)NeuropsychologyPediatricsCognitionAssociation (psychology)Physical therapyIschemic strokeInternal medicinePsychiatryPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Sleep-related breathing disorders (SRBDs) in childhood are associated with adverse outcomes including developmental and behavioral disorders. The association of SRBDs with pediatric stroke is poorly understood. We aimed to assess the risk of SRBDs in children with stroke or non-stroke high risk arteriopathies (NSA) and to evaluate their association with cognitive and behavioral function. Hypothesis: Children with stroke or NSA have a higher rate of SRBD and associated poor cognitive and behavioral function. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of children with arterial ischemic stroke (AIS), cerebral sinovenous thrombosis (CSVT) and NSA such as moyamoya. All children completed the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ). High risk for SRBDs was defined as a PSQ score ≥0.33. Children completed the Adaptive Behavior Assessment System (ABAS-2) parent and teacher forms and/or The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-V) within 1 year of completing the PSQ. Results: Overall, 213 were included (54% males, median age: 9 years [IQR 5-14]). Forty-nine children (23%) were at high risk of SRBDs. The risk of SRBDs did not vary with age, gender or stroke subtype: AIS (25%), CSVT (20%), other stroke subtypes (20%) and NSA (24%) (p= 0.8). Children with SRBD had higher mean BMI z-scores (0.9±1.5 vs 0.4±1.3, p=0.06). Twenty-four and 15 children underwent ABAS-2 parent and teacher assessment, respectively. The global adaptive composite scores of both forms significantly correlated with the total PSQ scores (r s =-0.6, p<0.01 for the parent form and r s =-0.63, p=0.01 for the teacher form). Correlation coefficients remained statistically significant upon controlling for BMI. In 19 children who completed the WISC-V, those at risk of SRBDs (n=7) had significantly lower Full Scale IQ (70±24.7 vs 91±17, p=0.03), processing speed (55±44 vs 96±19, p=0.02) and working memory (77±23 vs 98±15, p=0.02) compared to children at no risk. Cognitive and behavioral function did not differ across stroke subtypes. Conclusions: Pediatric stroke or NSA is commonly associated with SRBDs which in turn is linked to significant decline in cognitive and behavioral function. Further studies are required to understand the underlying pathological mechanisms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicCongenital Heart Disease Studies→French-language works237,207→