MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2914612280 · doi:10.1149/200424.0108pv

A Thermodynamic Database for AlCl3-Based Molten Salt Systems

2004· article· en· W2914612280 on OpenAlexaff
Christian Robelin

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Proceedings Volumes · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicMolten salt chemistry and electrochemical processes
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhase diagramThermodynamicsGibbs free energyTernary operationEnthalpyStoichiometryVapor pressureThermodynamic databases for pure substancesChemistryMixing (physics)Molten saltBinary numberPhase (matter)Thermodynamic processMaterial propertiesComputer sciencePhysical chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A thermodynamic database has been developed for the LiCl-NaCl-KCl-MgCl2-CaCl2-MnCl2-FeCl2-FeCl3-CoCl2-NiCl2-AlCl3 system. All binary subsystems (except AlCl3-FeCl3) as well as all higher order (mostly ternary) subsystems for which experimental data were available have been considered. A complete critical evaluation of all available phase diagram and thermodynamic data (enthalpy of mixing, emf and vapor pressure measurements) has been performed for all condensed phases (liquid, solid solutions, stoichiometric compounds) and relevant gaseous species, and optimized model parameters have been found which best reproduce all the data simultaneously. In this way the data have been rendered self-consistent, discrepancies among the data have been identified, and extrapolations and interpolations have been performed. The models can be used with Gibbs free energy minimization software to calculate phase diagram sections, vapor pressures, and all thermodynamic properties at all compositions over extended ranges of temperature and pressure. In this paper, the results obtained for the LiCl-NaCl-KCl-MgCl2-AlCl3 subsystem are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.207
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Proceedings VolumesSame topicMolten salt chemistry and electrochemical processesFrench-language works237,207