Programming Effects of Pubertal Lipopolysaccharide Treatment in Male and Female CD-1 Mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Puberty is a critical period of development marked by sexual, immune, and neural maturation. Exposure to stress during this period can lead to enduring changes in brain functioning and in behavior; however, the underlying mechanisms and the programming effects of stress during puberty remain unknown. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the programming effects of pubertal immune challenge in response to a homotypic stressor later in life in CD-1 mice. Age and sex differences in the peripheral and central cytokine levels, along with sickness behavior and telemetry data, were analyzed following the secondary treatment. The results showed that pretreatment with LPS attenuated the immune response to a second homotypic challenge. Males pretreated with LPS during puberty and in early adulthood displayed an attenuated hypothermic response following the second LPS treatment compared with saline-pretreated controls, which is consistent with the attenuated peripheral IL-6 and IFN-γ concentrations. Females pretreated with LPS during puberty displayed lower IL-1β, TNF-α, and IL-6 mRNA expression in the prefrontal cortex following the secondary immune challenge compared with saline controls. The results of this study show that exposure to LPS during puberty programs the peripheral and central immune responses, resulting in an attenuated immune response following a subsequent homotypic stressor. Thus, exposure to an immune challenge during puberty affects immune function later in life, which could permanently affect brain function and have implications on mental health.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".