MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2914742735 · doi:10.1159/000496151

Cuff-Based Oscillometric Measurements of Central Hemodynamics: Factors Influencing Central Augmentation Pressure in Normotensive Japanese Individuals

2018· article· en· W2914742735 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Masakazu Obayashi, Shigeki Kobayashi, Michiaki Kohno, Tomoko Nakashima, Masafumi Yano

Bibliographic record

VenuePulse · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersOmron HealthcareAGE-WELL
KeywordsBlood pressureHemodynamicsMedicinePopulationInternal medicineCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Recently, new devices using oscillometric cuff have been developed to derive central blood pressure (BP) waveform from brachial BP waveform. Late systolic pressure augmentation of central BP waveform is a marker of central hemodynamics. Mobil-O-Graph, a cuff-based oscillometric device, can assess central augmentation pressure (AP) together with central BP. Central AP measurement using the Mobil-O-Graph in the European population was reported to be associated with age and sex. However, factors influencing central AP in the Asian population have not been shown. <b><i>Objectives and Methods:</i></b> We enrolled 110 normotensive volunteers (50 men; age range, 21‒76 years). Central BP and AP were measured using the Mobil-O-Graph on the left arm with the subjects in the seated position after resting for at least 5 min. We compared central hemodynamics between the sexes. We investigated factors influencing central AP in uni- and multivariate linear regression analyses and age-related change in central AP using the Mobil-O-Graph in healthy Japanese individuals. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Central AP were lower in men than in women (5.5 ± 2.8 vs. 11.0 ± 4.7 mm Hg, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The central AP in the total cohort was positively correlated with age (<i>r</i> = 0.325, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and inversely correlated with height (<i>r</i> = −0.601, <i>p</i> < 0.001) in the Pearson correlations. In multivariate regression analysis, the parameters influencing central AP (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.467) were age (β = 0.097, <i>p</i> < 0.001), sex (β = −2.890, <i>p</i> = 0.010), and height (β = −0.153, <i>p</i> = 0.031). The central AP (10.0 ± 4.8 mm Hg) in the ≥50-year-old group significantly increased compared with those in the 20- to 39-year-old group (6.7 ± 4.2 mm Hg, <i>p</i> < 0.05). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Age, sex, and height influenced central AP, as assessed using the Mobil-O-Graph. Age-related increase in central AP was observed in normotensive Japanese individuals. Brachial cuff-based waveform recordings using the Mobil-O-Graph are feasible for the estimation of central AP in the Asian population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.694

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePulseSame topicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlFrench-language works237,207