An Experimental Evaluation of Fixed and Fluidized Beds of Zeolite 13X for the Application of Compact Thermal Energy Storage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For thermal energy storage technologies based on physical adsorption to become a commercially viable option in the future, particular advancements in the research and development of the system's components are required to complement existing research in advanced materials. To investigate the application of fluidization as a solid-gas contacting method for low-temperature thermochemical energy storage, a bench-scale adsorption-based TES system was designed, constructed, instrumented, and commissioned. In demonstrating this technology, the objective of this research was to obtain thermodynamic data for the adsorption of water vapour onto zeolite 13X under fluidization to evaluate fluidized beds as potential reactor or adsorber designs. Multiple adsorption experiments were performed on samples of an 8x12 and 60x65 mesh zeolite 13X molecular sieve, comparing the effects of air flow rate and concentration of water vapour on the breakthrough and temperature lift on the energy density of fixed and fluidized adsorbent beds. Variation of the air flow rate from 10 to 30 L/min had little effect "If the fool would persist in his folly he would become wise.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".